Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 1356853
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition of BOTTFLAG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOTTFLAG | Definition |
---|---|
0 | The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC. |
1 | The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material. |
2 | Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling. |
3 | The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired. |
4 | During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes. |
5 | Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered. |
6 | The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery. |
7 | Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist). |
8 | There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample. |
9 | The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage. |
Definition of Rank |
|
|
Problem Reports
No Problem Report Found in the Database
Data Access Policy
Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."
Narrative Documents
Niskin Bottle
The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.
Standard Niskin
The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.
Lever Action Niskin
The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.
Clean Sampling
A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.
Deployment
Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.
Dissolved ammonium concentrations (nanomolar sensitivity) for UK SOLAS cruise PO332
Originator's Protocol for Data Acquisition and Analysis
Samples for ammonium analyses were taken on a near daily basis from six to eight depths from Niskin bottles deployed on the stainless steel CTD rosette frame. Most of the CTD stations were covered. Reagent was added immediately and fluorimetric analysis was performed 24 h later following the method by Kerouel and Aminot (1997), a method which allows nanomolar sensitivity.
References Cited
Kerouel R. and Aminot A., 1997. Fluorometric determination of ammonia in sea and estuarine waters by direct segmented flow analysis. Marine Chemistry 57: 265-275.
BODC Data Processing Procedures
The data were submitted to BODC in a spreadsheet format file (BODC_depthprofilesP332_051006.xls) containing ammonium concentrations, other measured parameters from multiple originators, and the following metadata fields: station number, cast number, sampling gear, date, start time, end time, rosette position number, depth.
Parameter codes defined in BODC parameter dictionary were assigned to the variables as follows:
Originator's Parameter | Unit | Description | BODC Parameter Code | BODC Unit | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NH4 | nM | Concentration of dissolved ammonium | AMONNAKA | µmol l-1 | values converted by dividing by 1000 with precision valid to the fourth decimal. |
The data were then banked according to BODC standard procedures for sample data. Data were banked as received, with no averaging or other modifications applied.
Data Quality Report
Users should be aware that the data have been measured using a method allowing nanomolar sensitivity and the values in µmol l-1 are therefore precise to the fourth decimal place. One data point had an negative concentration value of -9 nmol l-1 (-0.009 µmol l-1) and was flagged suspect by BODC
A correction was made on 09/01/2014 to the firing depths of bottles ROSPOS#1 and ROSPOS#2 from CTD cast 045 when a routine check revealed that these two bottles had been matched to the wrong records in the SeaBird bottle file. The depths were changed from 143.2 and 145.1 m to 232.5 and 193.5 m respectively for bottles #1 and #2.
BODC is not aware of any other issues related to the quality of this data set.
Nanomolar sensitivity phosphate and nitrate profiles for UK SOLAS cruise PO332
Originator's Protocol for Data Acquisition and Analysis
Samples for nanomolar sensitivity nutrients were drawn from Niskin bottles deployed on the CTD rosette, from the trace metal clean GO-FLO bottles, and from the surface underway towed fish. The samples were taken in acid-washed 60 ml and 125 ml HDPE bottles. Only samples believed to have very low concentrations of dissolved nutrients were analysed.
Analyses for nitrate and nitrite (jointly nitrate) and phosphate at nanomolar concentrations were conducted on a purpose built, segmented flow autoanalyser. The method is described and reviewed in detail by Patey et al, 2008. Two liquid waveguide capillary flow cells provided a two metre pathlength. Two tungsten-halogen light sources were used in conjunction with fibre optic spectrometers to monitor the absorbance of the solution flowing through the waveguide.
References Cited
Patey M.D., Rijkenberg M.J.R., Statham P.J., Stinchcombe M.C., Achterberg E.P., Mowlem M., 2003. Determination of nitrate and phosphate in seawater at nanomolar concentrations. Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 22, 819-827.
BODC Data Processing Procedures
The data were submitted to BODC in a spreadsheet format file (BODC_depthprofilesP332_051006.xls) containing nanomolar sensitivity nitrate and phosphate, micromolar sensitivity nutrients, other measured parameters from multiple originators, and the following metadata fields: station number, cast number, sampling gear, date, start time, end time, rosette position number, depth. Some bottles from casts 4, 10, 21, 24 and 26 were sampled in duplicate. Measurements from replicate samples were averaged together, and the standard deviation banked alongside the average
Parameter codes defined in BODC parameter dictionary were assigned to the variables as follows:
Originator's Parameter | Units | Description | BODC Parameter Code | Units | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nM NO3 | nM | Concentration of nitrate plus nitrite (nanomolar sensitivity) | NTRZLWTX | µmol l-1 | Values converted by dividing by 1000, with precision valid to the fourth decimal |
n/a | n/a | Standard deviation of replicate nitrate samples | SDNZLWTX | µmol l-1 | n/a |
nM PO4 | nM | Concentration of phosphate (nanomolar sensitivity) | PHOSLWTX | µmol l-1 | Values converted by dividing by 1000, with precision valid to the fourth decimal |
n/a | n/a | Standard deviation of replicate phosphate samples | SDPHLWTX | µmol l-1 | n/a |
The data were then loaded into the BODC database following established BODC data banking procedures.
Data Quality Report
Data users should be aware that the data have been measured using a method allowing nanomolar sensitivity and the values in µmol l-1 are therefore precise to the fourth decimal place.
Project Information
UK Surface Ocean Lower Atmosphere Study
The UK Surface Ocean Lower Atmosphere Study (UK SOLAS) is the UK's contribution to the international SOLAS programme.
UK SOLAS formed interdisciplinary teams to address three primary aims
- To determine the mechanisms controlling rates of chemical transfer and improve estimates of chemical exchanges
- To evaluate the impact of these exchanges on the biogeochemistry of the surface ocean and lower atmosphere and on feedbacks between the ocean and atmosphere
- To quantify the impacts of these boundary layer processes on the global climate system
UK SOLAS started in 2003, to run for seven years. The programme was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council.
Funded projects
In total, 19 projects have been funded by UK SOLAS, over four funding rounds.
Project Title | Short Title | Principal Investigator |
---|---|---|
Impact of atmospheric dust derived material and nutrient inputs on near-surface plankton microbiota in the tropical North Atlantic | Dust | Eric Achterberg |
The role and effects of photoprotective compounds in marine plankton | - | Steve Archer |
Field observations of sea spray, gas fluxes and whitecaps | SEASAW | Ian Brooks |
Factors influencing the biogeochemistry of iodine in the marine environment | - | Lucy Carpenter |
Global model of aerosol processes - effects of aerosol in the marine atmospheric boundary layer | GLOMAP | Ken Carslaw |
Ecological controls on fluxes of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) to the atmosphere | - | David Green |
Dust outflow and deposition to the ocean | DODO | Ellie Highwood |
Investigation of near surface production of iodocarbons - rates and exchanges | INSPIRE | Gill Malin |
Reactive halogens in the marine boundary layer | RHaMBLe | Gordon McFiggans |
The role of bacterioneuston in determining trace gas exchange rates | - | Colin Murrell |
Measuring methanol in sea water and investigating its sources and sinks in the marine environment | - | Phil Nightingale |
The impact of coastal upwellings on air-sea exchange of climatically important gases | ICON | Carol Robinson |
The Deep Ocean Gas Exchange Experiment | DOGEE | Rob Upstill-Goddard |
High wind air-sea exchanges | HiWASE | Margaret Yelland |
Aerosol characterisation and modelling in the marine environment | ACMME | James Allan |
3D simulation of dimethyl sulphide (DMS) in the north east Atlantic | - | Icarus Allen |
Processes affecting the chemistry and bioavailability of dust borne iron | - | Michael Krom |
The chemical structure of the lowermost atmosphere | - | Alastair Lewis |
Factors influencing the oxidative chemistry of the marine boundary layer | - | Paul Monks |
UK SOLAS has also supported ten tied studentships, and two CASE studentships.
Fieldwork
UK SOLAS fieldwork has included eight dedicated research cruises in the North Atlantic Ocean. Continuous measurements were made aboard aboard the Norwegian weather ship, Polarfront, until her decommission in 2009. Time series have been established at the SOLAS Cape Verde Observatory, and at the Plymouth Marine Laboratory L4 station. Experiments have taken place at the Bergen mesocosm facility.
A series of collaborative aircraft campaigns have added complementary atmospheric data. These campaigns were funded by UK SOLAS, African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analyses (AMMA-UK), Dust and Biomass Experiment (DABEX) and the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements (FAAM).
Weblink: http://www.nerc.ac.uk/research/programmes/solas/
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Cruise
Cruise Name | PO332 |
Departure Date | 2006-01-26 |
Arrival Date | 2006-02-26 |
Principal Scientist(s) | Eric Pieter Achterberg (University of Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Science) |
Ship | FS Poseidon |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |