Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 119615

• Metadata Summary

• Problem Reports

• Data Access Policy

• Narrative Documents

• Project Information

• Data Activity or Cruise Information

• Fixed Station Information

• BODC Quality Flags

• SeaDataNet Quality Flags

Metadata Summary

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database

Data Access Policy

Public domain data

These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.

The recommended acknowledgment is

"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."

Narrative Documents

Christian Albrechts University of Kiel Multisonde CTD profiler

A prototype conductivity-temperature-pressure profiler developed in the 1970s by what was then the Institute for Applied Physics of Kiel University. The instrument could measure up to six parameters in total, including sound velocity and light attenuation by means of an auxiliary light sensor. The unit was used by the then Institute for Marine Science, Kiel.

Specifications

FS Meteor 49 CTD Data Documentation

Instrumentation

Two instruments were used, the Multisonde (Kroebel, 1973) and, as a back-up device, the Bathysonde (Hinkelmann, 1957). Both units measure electrical conductivity, temperature and hydrostatic pressure. They were lowered on a single-conductor cable.

The manufacturer's specifications for the Multisonde are given below:

Profiles Taken

Throughout all phases, the lowering depth was 60 - 1600m, the lowering speed was 60 m/min and the sampling rate was 10/sec.

Calibration

In order to check the calibration during the experiment, a Nansen bottle with two protected reversing thermometers was attached to the cable close to the underwater unit. Various combinations of 9 thermometers on FS Meteor were used. 59 water samples were taken mostly from the upper 20 m during Multisonde casts. It was assumed that a proper re-calibration could be achieved by determining the off-set in temperature and conductivity at these depth levels. The pressure off-set was found by reading the pressure value at the sea surface. There was no time dependence of these re-calibration terms.

The results of the re-calibration analysis are summarised below:

where:

• Pressure off-set is the CTD pressure reading at the surface
• T_Nansen is the temperature reading of reversing thermometer
• T_CTD is the temperature reading of CTD
• T_Nansen - T_CTD is the mean difference between reversing thermometer and CTD temperature reading
• Delta T_Nansen is the mean temperature difference between two reversing thermometers in a Nansen bottle
• C_Nansen is the conductivity determined from Nansen bottle sample
• C_CTD conductivity reading of CTD
• C_Nansen - C_CTD is the mean difference between Nansen bottle and CTD conductivity reading
• Time constant is the best time constant of the thermometer to optimise the reduction of salinity spikes.

The salinity measurements of the Nansen samples were carried out using a Beckmann RS7B lab and an Autosal 8400 salinometer. Conductivity was calculated from the salinity values by an iterative reversal of Fofonoff's (1974) formula using Newton's formula (Peters, 1978).

Data Processing

Due to the slow response of the Multisonde thermometers compared to the conductivity sensors, spikes occurred in the salinity profiles. The thermometer time constants were changed in the calculations to optimise the spike reduction. After clipping remaining spikes in salinity, a running mean over about 0.5 dbar was taken. The data were then interpolated to 0.5 dbar increments and, again, a running mean over 1.5 dbar was calculated. A detailed description of this kind of data editing was given by Peters (1976).

General Data Screening carried out by BODC

BODC screen both the series header qualifying information and the parameter values in the data cycles themselves.

Header information is inspected for:

• Irregularities such as unfeasible values
• Inconsistencies between related information, for example:
  • Times for instrument deployment and for start/end of data series
  • Length of record and the number of data cycles/cycle interval
  • Parameters expected and the parameters actually present in the data cycles
• Originator's comments on meter/mooring performance and data quality

Documents are written by BODC highlighting irregularities which cannot be resolved.

Data cycles are inspected using time or depth series plots of all parameters. Currents are additionally inspected using vector scatter plots and time series plots of North and East velocity components. These presentations undergo intrinsic and extrinsic screening to detect infeasible values within the data cycles themselves and inconsistencies as seen when comparing characteristics of adjacent data sets displaced with respect to depth, position or time. Values suspected of being of non-oceanographic origin may be tagged with the BODC flag denoting suspect value; the data values will not be altered.

The following types of irregularity, each relying on visual detection in the plot, are amongst those which may be flagged as suspect:

• Spurious data at the start or end of the record.
• Obvious spikes occurring in periods free from meteorological disturbance.
• A sequence of constant values in consecutive data cycles.

If a large percentage of the data is affected by irregularities then a Problem Report will be written rather than flagging the individual suspect values. Problem Reports are also used to highlight irregularities seen in the graphical data presentations.

Inconsistencies between the characteristics of the data set and those of its neighbours are sought and, where necessary, documented. This covers inconsistencies such as the following:

• Maximum and minimum values of parameters (spikes excluded).
• The occurrence of meteorological events.

This intrinsic and extrinsic screening of the parameter values seeks to confirm the qualifying information and the source laboratory's comments on the series. In screening and collating information, every care is taken to ensure that errors of BODC making are not introduced.

Project Information

Joint Air Sea Interaction Experiment (JASIN)

The JASIN Project was designed to study the interaction of the atmospheric and oceanic boundary layers with the larger scale motions of the sea and the air.

The primary aims may be summarized as follows:

1. To observe and distinguish between the physical processes causing mixing in the atmospheric and oceanic boundary layers and relate them to the mean properties of the layers.

2. To examine and quantify aspects of the momentum and heat budgets in the atmospheric and oceanic boundary layers and fluxes across and between them.

The multiplicity of processes to be sampled necessitated a large experiment and JASIN involved 14 ships and 3 aircraft with more than 50 teams of investigators from 9 countries. Altogether 35 mooring systems were deployed.

The experiment lasted for 2 months from mid-July to mid-September 1978 and comprised 2 intensive measuring periods preceded by a preparatory test period. The project took place in the north Rockall Trough, an area of deep water (1000m - 2000m) several hundred kilometres off the west coast of Scotland.

Data Activity or Cruise Information

Cruise

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here

Fixed Station Information

No Fixed Station Information held for the Series

BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle: