Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 1266416


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Technicap NOEX bottle  discrete water samplers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country Netherlands
Originator Dr Wim Helder
Originating Organization Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) OMEX I
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier PLG93_CTD_NUTS_11:CP8
BODC Series Reference 1266416
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1993-10-24 11:16
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 49.08330 N ( 49° 5.0' N )
Longitude 13.43000 W ( 13° 25.8' W )
Positional Uncertainty Unspecified
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 3.0 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 3657.3 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 2.7 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 3657.0 m
Sea Floor Depth 3660.0 m
Sea Floor Depth Source -
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
AMONAATX1Micromoles per litreConcentration of ammonium {NH4+ CAS 14798-03-9} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by colorimetric autoanalysis
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
NTRIAATX1Micromoles per litreConcentration of nitrite {NO2- CAS 14797-65-0} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by colorimetric autoanalysis
NTRZAATX1Micromoles per litreConcentration of nitrate+nitrite {NO3+NO2} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by colorimetric autoanalysis
PHOSAATX1Micromoles per litreConcentration of phosphate {PO43- CAS 14265-44-2} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by colorimetric autoanalysis
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number
SLCAAATX1Micromoles per litreConcentration of silicate {SiO44- CAS 17181-37-2} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by colorimetric autoanalysis

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Public domain data

These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.

The recommended acknowledgment is

"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."


Narrative Documents

Technicap NOEX bottle

The Technicap NOEX water bottle was designed for oceanographic sampling. The bottle comprises a plastic tube with caps at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, then closed at the target depth. Multiple bottles can be deployed on a CTD frame rosette. Bottle capacity is variable, but normally several litres. The bottle was developed by Technicap in the 1990s but has been superseded by more recent models. There is no known source of support available for this sampler.

Nutrients for cruises Belgica BG9309, Charles Darwin CD86 and Pelagia PLG93 and PLG95B

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation.

Content of data series

AMONAAD2 Dissolved ammonium
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
AMONAATX Dissolved ammonium
Colorometric autoanalysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
AMONMATX Ammonium (unfiltered)
Manual colorometric analysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRIAAD2 Dissolved nitrite
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRIAAD5 Dissolved nitrite
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.2 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRIAATX Nitrite (unfiltered)
Colorometric autoanalysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRZAAD2 Dissolved nitrate + nitrite
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRZAAD5 Dissolved nitrate + nitrite
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.2 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTRZAATX Nitrate + nitrite (unfiltered)
Colorometric autoanalysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
PHOSAAD2 Dissolved phosphate
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
PHOSAAD5 Dissolved phosphate
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.2 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
PHOSAATX Phosphate (unfiltered)
Colorometric autoanalysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
PHOSMATX Phosphate (unfiltered)
Manual colorometric analysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
SLCAAAD2 Dissolved silicate
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
SLCAAAD5 Dissolved silicate
Colorometric autoanalysis (0.2 µm pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
SLCAAATX Silicate (unfiltered)
Colorometric autoanalysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
SLCAMATX Silicate (unfiltered)
Manual colorometric analysis (unfiltered)
Micromoles/litre
UREAMDTX Urea (unfiltered)
Manual analysis using the diacetylmonoxime method
Micromoles/litre

Data Originator

Dr Wim Helder, NIOZ, Texel, the Netherlands.

Sampling strategy and methodology

Samples were taken from water bottles deployed on a CTD rosette and analysed at sea using a TRAACS 80 autoanalyser, usually within 4 hours of collection. Samples were stored in cool and dark conditions between collection and analysis.

On cruise Pelagia 93, the samples from the CTD rosette were analysed unfiltered. On Charles Darwin 86 and Pelagia 95, the samples were filtered through a 0.45 micron acrodisc filter to improve the quality of the ammonium results.

The following chemistries were used:

Ammonium: Phenol method
Phosphate: Ammonium molybdate / ascorbic acid method
Nitrate / nitrite: Sulphanylamide / napthylethylenediamine method using a Cu/Cd coil (efficiency >98%) for reduction
Silicate: Ammonium molybdate / ascorbic acid method

Samples were always analysed from the surface to the bottom to minimise the risk of cross-sample contamination.

Working standards were freshly prepared daily by diluting stock standards to the required concentration with natural, aged, low-nutrient seawater. The nutrient concentrations in this were determined by manual colorometric analysis. The low-nutrient seawater was also used as a wash between samples. A second mixed nutrient stock, poisoned with 0.2% chloroform or 20 mg/l HgCl2, was used as an independent check. Pipettes and volumetric flasks were calibrated before each cruise and standard batches were intercalibrated.

Accuracy of analyses is reported as about 1% of the full scale value for nitrate, nitrite and silicate and 2% of the full scale for phosphate and ammonium.

The data were reported as nitrate and nitrite, the nitrate values having been computed by subtracting nitrite from nitrate plus nitrite. BODC practice is to store nitrate plus nitrite and the values in the database have been determined by summing the nitrate and nitrite values supplied. In cases where multiple bottles were fired at a single depth, nutrient values were reported from each bottle. These have been averaged, excluding any bottles flagged as leaking, to give a single nutrient value for each depth.

Comments on data quality

Belgica BG9309

The SKALAR autoanalyser phosphate data were supplied with a warning that there may be problems. On a number of stations all three laboratories provided phosphates and for a number of stations there were also manually analysed phosphates from ULB. Comparing these data it can be clearly seen that the SKALAR values are frequently way too high. Consequently, the SKALAR phosphate data set has been flagged 'L'.

For the stations where inter-comparison of NO3+NO2 data is possible, the ULB data are generally higher than the VUB data which are, in turn, generally higher than the CSIC data. None of the data have been flagged. Users are advised to retrieve all three data sets and reach their own conclusions about which data to use.

References

Armstrong, F.A.J., Stearns, C.R. and Strickland, J.D.H., 1967. The measurement of upwelling and subsequent biological processes by means of the Technicon Autoanalyser and associated equipment. Deep Sea Res. 14, 381-389.

Eberlein, K. and Kattner, G. 1987. Automatic method for the determination of ortho-phosphate and total dissolved phosphorus in the marine environment. Fresenius Z. anal. Chem., 326, 354-357.

Elskens, I. and Elskens, M., 1989. Handleing voor de bepaling van nutrienten in zeewater met an Autoanalyser IITM systeem. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 50pp..

Føyn, L., Magnussen, M. and Seglem, K., 1981. Automatisk analyse av naeringsalter med "on-line" databehandling. En presentasjon av oppbyggning og virkemåte av systemet i bruk på Havforskningsinstituttets båter og i laboratoriet. Fisken Hav., Ser. B., 4, 1-40.

Goeyens, L,. Kindermans, N., Yusuf, M.A. and Elskens, M. (submitted 1996). A room temperature procedure for the manual determination of urea in seawater. Submitted to Marine Chemistry.

Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M. and Kremling, K. eds. 1983. Methods of seawater analysis. Verlag Chemie.

Koroleff, F., 1969. Direct determination of ammonia in natural waters as indophenol blue. Int. Counc. Explor. Sea, CM., 9, 19-22.

Mourino, C. and Fraga, F., 1985. Determinacion de nitratos en aqua de mar. Investigacion Pesquera, 49, 81-96.

Mulvena, P. and Savidge, G., 1992. A modified manual method for the determination of urea in seawater using diacetylmonoxime reagent. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 34, 429-438.

Murphy, J. and Riley, J.P., 1962. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytica Chim. Acta, 27, 31-36.

Rees, A.P., Owens, N.J.P. and Woodward, E.M.S. (1995). Phytoplankton nitrogen assimilation at low nutrient concentrations in the NW Mediterranean Sea. Water Pollution Research Report 32 in EROS 2000 ed J-M Martin and H. Barth, European Commission, 141-148.


Project Information

Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) I

Introduction

OMEX was a European multidisciplinary oceanographic research project that studied and quantified the exchange processes of carbon and associated elements between the continental shelf of western Europe and the open Atlantic Ocean. The project ran in two phases known as OMEX I (1993-1996) and OMEX II - II (1997-2000), with a bridging phase OMEX II - I (1996-1997). The project was supported by the European Union under the second and third phases of its MArine Science and Technology Programme (MAST) through contracts MAS2-CT93-0069 and MAS3-CT97-0076. It was led by Professor Roland Wollast from Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium and involved more than 100 scientists from 10 European countries.

Scientific Objectives

The aim of the Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) project was to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring at the ocean margins in order to quantify fluxes of energy and matter (carbon, nutrients and other trace elements) across this boundary. The research culminated in the development of quantitative budgets for the areas studied using an approach based on both field measurements and modeling.

OMEX I (1993-1996)

The first phase of OMEX was divided into sub-projects by discipline:

  • Physics
  • Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Biological Processes
  • Benthic Processes
  • Carbon Cycling and Biogases

This emphasises the multidisciplinary nature of the research.

The project fieldwork focussed on the region of the European Margin adjacent to the Goban Spur (off the coast of Brittany) and the shelf break off Tromsø, Norway. However, there was also data collected off the Iberian Margin and to the west of Ireland. In all a total of 57 research cruises (excluding 295 Continuous Plankton Recorder tows) were involved in the collection of OMEX I data.

Data Availability

Field data collected during OMEX I have been published by BODC as a CD-ROM product, entitled:

  • OMEX I Project Data Set (two discs)

Further descriptions of this product and order forms may be found on the BODC web site.

The data are also held in BODC's databases and subsets may be obtained by request from BODC.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1993-10-24
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1993-10-24
Organization Undertaking ActivityRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Country of OrganizationNetherlands
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierPLG93_CTD_CP8
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for PLG93_CTD_CP8

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
551680   12.00        2.30    3.80    3.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551681   12.00       70.30   71.80   70.40 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551682   12.00      200.30  201.80  199.20 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551683   12.00      795.30  796.80  787.80 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551684   12.00     1145.30 1146.80 1133.20 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551685   12.00     1468.30 1469.80 1451.50 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551686   12.00     1752.30 1753.80 1730.90 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551687   12.00     3720.30 3721.80 3657.30 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1

Cruise

Cruise Name PE093
Departure Date 1993-10-13
Arrival Date 1993-10-31
Principal Scientist(s)Wim Helder (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)
Ship RV Pelagia

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information


No Fixed Station Information held for the Series


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: PLG93_CTD_CP8

Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
1637521Water sample data1993-10-24 11:16:0049.0833 N, 13.43 WRV Pelagia PE093