Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 1667215
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition of BOTTFLAG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOTTFLAG | Definition |
---|---|
0 | The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC. |
1 | The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material. |
2 | Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling. |
3 | The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired. |
4 | During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes. |
5 | Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered. |
6 | The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery. |
7 | Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist). |
8 | There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample. |
9 | The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage. |
Definition of Rank |
|
|
Problem Reports
No Problem Report Found in the Database
Data Access Policy
Open Data
These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.
If the Information Provider does not provide a specific attribution statement, or if you are using Information from several Information Providers and multiple attributions are not practical in your product or application, you may consider using the following:
"Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v1.0."
Narrative Documents
Niskin Bottle
The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.
Standard Niskin
The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.
Lever Action Niskin
The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.
Clean Sampling
A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.
Deployment
Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.
Pigments for Charles Darwin and RRS Challenger cruises
Document History
Converted from CDROM documentation.
Content of data series
CPHLFLP1 | Fluorometric chlorophyll-a |
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
CPHLFLP4 | Fluorometric chlorophyll-a |
Fluorometric assay of acetone extraction (sum of size fractions >0.2 microns) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
CPHLPR01 | CTD chlorophyll |
Calibrated in-situ fluorometer | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
PHAEFLP1 | Fluorometric phaeopigments |
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
SCHLFLPF | Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a |
Fluorometric assay of an acetone extract (0.2-2µm size fraction) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
SCHLFLPG | Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a |
Fluorometric assay of an acetone extract (2-20µm size fraction) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre | |
SCHLFLPQ | Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a |
Fluorometric assay of an acetone extract (>20µm size fraction) | |
Milligrams/cubic metre |
Data Originator
Dr Ken Jones, CCMS Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, UK.
Sampling strategy and methodology
Charles Darwin cruises CD91B, CD93A and CD93B and RRS Challenger cruises CH121A, CH121B, CH121C, CH123A, CH123B, CH125A, CH125B, CH126A, CH126B, CH128A and CH128B.
Samples were collected from either the non-toxic surface sea water supply or from Niskin bottles fitted to the CTD rosette. They were taken in Nalgene bottles, rinsed twice with sample water prior to filling.
The samples were vacuum filtered through 2.5 cm GF/F filters. The volume of water filtered varied depending on the particulate load in the sample. The filters were folded and immediately frozen.
Back in the laboratory, the filters were extracted into 8 ml of 90% neutralised acetone and stored for between 18 and 36 hours in a refrigerator. The extracts were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for two 5-minute bursts.
The resulting chlorophyll solutions were assayed on a bench fluorometer. Three drops of 8% HCl were added and the assay was repeated. Chlorophyll-a and phaeopigment concentrations were determined from the two fluorometer readings using the equations in Tett and Grantham (1978).
References
Tett P. and Grantham B. 1978. A simple guide to the measurement and interpretation of chlorophyll concentration, temperature and salinity, in coastal waters. SMBA. 85pp.
Project Information
LOIS Shelf Edge Study (LOIS - SES)
Introduction
SES was a component of the NERC Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS) Community Research Programme that made intensive measurements from the shelf break in the region known as the Hebridean Slope from March 1995 to September 1996.
Scientific Rationale
SES was devoted to the study of interactions between the shelf seas and the open ocean. The specific objectives of the project were:
-
To identify the time and space scales of ocean-shelf momentum transmission and to quantify the contributions to ocean-shelf water exchange by physical processes.
-
To estimate fluxes of water, heat and certain dissolved and suspended constituents across a section of the shelf edge with special emphasis on net carbon export from, and nutrient import to, the shelf.
-
To incorporate process understanding into models and test these models by comparison with observations and provide a basis for estimation of fluxes integrated over time and the length of the shelf.
Fieldwork
The SES fieldwork was focussed on a box enclosing two sections across the shelf break at 56.4-56.5 °N and 56.6-56.7 °N. Moored instrument arrays were maintained throughout the experiment at stations with water depths ranging from 140 m to 1500 m, although there were heavy losses due to the intensive fishing activity in the area. The moorings included meteorological buoys, current meters, transmissometers, fluorometers, nutrient analysers (but these never returned any usable data), thermistor chains, colour sensors and sediment traps.
The moorings were serviced by research cruises at approximately three-monthly intervals. In addition to the mooring work this cruises undertook intensive CTD, water bottle and benthic surveys with cruise durations of up to 6 weeks (3 legs of approximately 2 weeks each).
Moored instrument activities associated with SES comprised current measurements in the North Channel in 1993 and the Tiree Passage from 1995-1996. These provided boundary conditions for SES modelling activities.
Additional data were provided through cruises undertaken by the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) in a co-operative programme known as SESAME.
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Data Activity
Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 1996-07-23 |
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 1996-07-23 |
Organization Undertaking Activity | University of Wales, Bangor School of Ocean Sciences (now Bangor University School of Ocean Sciences) |
Country of Organization | United Kingdom |
Originator's Data Activity Identifier | CH128A_CTD_CP84 |
Platform Category | lowered unmanned submersible |
BODC Sample Metadata Report for CH128A_CTD_CP84
Sample reference number | Nominal collection volume(l) | Bottle rosette position | Bottle firing sequence number | Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) | Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) | Depth of sampling point (m) | Bottle type | Sample quality flag | Bottle reference | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84063 | 10.00 | 143.00 | 143.70 | 140.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||||
84064 | 10.00 | 31.10 | 31.60 | 29.80 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||||
84207 | 10.00 | 61.20 | 61.90 | 59.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||||
84208 | 10.00 | 4.90 | 5.50 | 3.90 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported |
Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.
Cruise
Cruise Name | CH128A |
Departure Date | 1996-07-10 |
Arrival Date | 1996-07-26 |
Principal Scientist(s) | John H Simpson (University of Wales, Bangor School of Ocean Sciences) |
Ship | RRS Challenger |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |