Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2051959


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Teflon-coated Niskin bottle  discrete water samplers
Flow injection chemiluminescence system with photon counting head  chemiluminescence analysers; flow injection analysers
Shimadzu RF-20 A fluorescence detector  fluorometers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator Prof Maeve Lohan
Originating Organization University of Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Science
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) ZIPLOc
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier JC150_UCCTD_TMXX_4894:CTD019T
BODC Series Reference 2051959
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 2017-07-08 06:43
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 22.00000 N ( 22° 0.0' N )
Longitude 54.00000 W ( 54° 0.0' W )
Positional Uncertainty 0.0 to 0.01 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 100.1 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 5863.0 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 10.8 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 5773.7 m
Sea Floor Depth 5873.8 m
Sea Floor Depth Source PEVENT
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
CZI870011Nanomoles per kilogramConcentration of zinc {Zn CAS 7440-66-6} per unit mass of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.2um phase] by filtration, acidification and flow-injection fluorometry
CZI870021Nanomoles per kilogramConcentration standard deviation of zinc {Zn CAS 7440-66-6} per unit mass of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.2um phase] by filtration, acidification and flow-injection fluorometry
DFEFICHL1Nanomoles per litreConcentration of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.2um phase] by filtration and flow-injection chemiluminescence
DFEFICSD1Nanomoles per litreConcentration standard deviation of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.2um phase] by filtration and flow-injection chemiluminescence
FESDCLDX1Nanomoles per litreConcentration standard deviation of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by acidification and flow-injection chemiluminescence
FEXXCLDX1Nanomoles per litreConcentration of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by acidification and flow-injection chemiluminescence
FIRSEQID1DimensionlessBottle firing sequence number
ROSPOSID1DimensionlessBottle rosette position identifier
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number
SFEFICHL1Nanomoles per litreConcentration of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.02um phase] by filtration and flow-injection chemiluminescence
SFEFICSD1Nanomoles per litreConcentration standard deviation of soluble iron {soluble_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.02um phase] by filtration and flow-injection chemiluminescence

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."


Narrative Documents

Flow Injection Chemiluminescence System

The Flow Injection Chemiluminescence (FI-CL) technique is based on a flow injection method coupled with chemiluminescence detection. A FI-CL system is composed of individual components that are typically uniquely assembled for each analysis. The model and manufacturer of each component can vary.

A typical FI-CL system consists of peristaltic pumps, multiway valves, a flow injection valve, a preconcentration column and chemiluminscence detector, such as a photon-counting head. Peristaltic pumps are used to deliver the reagent, sample, buffer and wash solutions to the system's components, and multi way valves enable the sample and wash solutions to pass sequentially through the preconcentration column. The injection valve is used to transport the sample to the detector. Cycles of loading, washing and injection may be computer controlled.

Niskin Bottle

The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.

Standard Niskin

The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.

Lever Action Niskin

The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.

Clean Sampling

A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.

Deployment

Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.

Shimadzu RF-20 A fluorescence detector

A high-sensitivity fluorescence spectrometer used to identify and quantify trace-level components of liquid samples, for applications such as food, pharmaceutical and environmental analyses. The fluorescence detector uses the principle of Raman spectroscopy to excite the liquid sample with excitation light from a Xenon lamp, and breaks up the emitted fluorescence light with a fluorescence monochromator. It extracts the required fluorescence wavelengths and measures the intensity with a photomultiplier. The RF-20A is capable of ultra fast, high-sensitivity multi-component analysis using a wavelength switching by time program, and utilises a four-wavelength measurement function that detects each component at its optical wavelength. Optional additions include an Amino Acid Analysis System, a Reducing Sugar Analysis System, a Carbamate Pesticide Analysis System and a Synthetic Antibacterial Agent/Mycotoxin Screening System. The RF-20A achieves a water Raman S/N ratio of 1200, and the Xenon lamp lasts approximately 2000 hours. It also has a 10 ms response time, and a wavelength range of 0, 200 nm to 650 nm.

For more information, please see this document: https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/documents/nodb/pdf/shimadzu_RF-20A_brochure.pdf

Total dissolved trace metals from titanium CTD bottle samples for JC150

Acquisition description:

Sampling methodology

Seawater samples were collected during cruise JC150 in the subtropical North Atlantic. The cruise took place during summer (26th June to 12th August 2017) sampling between Guadeloupe and Tenerife on-board the R.R.S. James Cook. Seven stations were occupied for high resolution vertical profiling. Seawater samples were collected according to the GEOTRACES guidelines.

A titanium rosette fitted with 24 x 10 L trace metal-clean Teflon-coated OTE (Ocean Test Equipment) bottles and a CTD profiler (Sea-bird Scientific) were deployed on a conducting Kevlar wire to collect samples from the water column. Upon recovery, the OTE bottles were transported into a class 1000 clean air van and pressurized (0.7 bar) with compressed air filtered in-line through a 0.2 µm PTFE filter capsule (Millex-FG 50, Millipore). Unfiltered samples were collected for total dissolvable iron and zinc, which is solubilized after at least 6 months of acidification to 0.024 M HCL.

Sub-samples for dFe were filtered through 0.45/0.2 µm two-step acetate membrane cartridge filters (Sartobran-300, Sartorius) into trace metal-clean 125 ml low-density polyethylene (LDPE) bottles and acidified to pH 1.7 (0.024 M) by addition of 12 M ultrapure hydrochloric acid (HCl, Romil, UpA) under a class 100 laminar flow hood (Lohan et al., 2006). Samples for sFe went through an additional in-line filtration step through 0.02 µm syringe filters (Anotop, Whatman) before acidification, whereas samples for TDFe were collected unfiltered and then acidified.

Analytical methodology

Iron

All dFe, sFe and TDFe samples were analysed in triplicate using flow injection analysis with chemiluminescence detection (Birchill et al., 2017; Obata et al., 1993; 1997) inside a class 1000 clean air laboratory either on-board the R.R.S. James Cook or subsequently at the National Oceanography Centre Southampton, UK. Each sample was spiked one hour prior to analysis with 0.013 M ultrapure H2O2 (Sigma-Aldrich) in a ratio of 1 µl H2O2 per ml sample to ensure the complete oxidation of Fe(II) to Fe(III) (Lohan et al., 2006). Each sample was buffered in-line to pH 3.5-4.0 using 0.15 M ammonium acetate (Romil, SpA) before Fe(III) was selectively pre-concentrated onto the cation exchange resin Toyopearl-AF-Chelate 650 M (Tosohaas). Following the removal of the seawater matrix from the resin using a weak 0.013 M HCl (Romil, SpA) wash, the Fe was liberated from the resin using 0.24 M HCl (Romil, SpA) and entered the reaction stream. The eluent was mixed downstream with a 0.015 mM luminol solution containing 70 µl L-1 triethylenetetramine (both Sigma-Aldrich), buffered to pH 9.4-9.6 using 1 M ammonia solution (Romil, SpA) with the chemiluminescent reaction occurring following the addition of 0.4 M H2O2 (Rose & Waite, 2001). The light signal at a wavelength of 425 nm was detected by a photomultiplier tube and concentrations were quantified using standard additions to low Fe seawater. The limit of detection (3x the standard deviation of the lowest standard addition) was 0.03±0.02 nM (n = 59), whilst the precision of triplicate analysis was 2.78±2.02 % (n = 1764). The accuracy of the method was established by repeat quantification of dFe in the SAFe reference samples yielding values of 0.11±0.02 nM (n = 6) and 0.94±0.04 nM (n = 17) for SAFe S and SAFe D2 respectively, which are in close agreement with the reported consensus values (S = 0.095±0.008 nM; D2 = 0.96±0.02 nM).

Zinc

Following collection, all sub-samples were acidified (0.024 M HCl; Romil SpA) and then analysed onboard ship for DZn concentration using flow-injection analysis with fluorimetric detection, as first described by Nowicki et al. (1994). 20 mL of seawater was buffered in-line (pH 4.5) and then DZn pre-concentrated for 200 seconds onto a cation exchange resin (Toyopearl AF650 Chelate). The major seawater cations were rinsed from the resin with weak NH4OAc before the DZn liberated from the resin with HCl and then mixed with p-tosyl-8-aminoquinoline (pTAQ, Sigma-Aldrich), which forms a stable fluorescent complex with Zn(II). The fluorescent reaction was measured by a Shimadzu RF-20A fluorimeter. Dissolved Zn was determined using two separate calibration curves, depending on ambient concentrations as Zn concentrations ranged from 30 pM to 4.5 nM at depth. Calibration standards were made using low Zn seawater collected from the towed 'fish'. Each sub-sample was run in triplicate with each complete analytical cycle taking 18 minutes. The analysis produced excellent analytical figures of merit with detection limits 10-30 pM and excellent agreement with SAFe and GEOTRACES reference samples.

Aluminum

All dAl samples were analysed in triplicate using flow injection analysis with fluroimetric detection (Resing & Measures, 1994; Brown & Bruland, 2008) inside a class 1000 clean air laboratory at the National Oceanography Centre Southampton, UK. Briefly, the sample was buffered in-line to pH 6 with 0.8 M ammonium acetate before being loaded onto a chelating iminodiacetic acid (Toyopearl AF-Chelate 650 M) preconcentration column. The column was rinsed using 0.01 M ammonium acetate to remove the seawater matrix cations before Al was eluted from the column with 0.1 M HCl (SpA, Romil). The HCl eluent entered the reaction stream where it mixed with a 4.8 mM lumogallion solution and 5% solution of Brij-35. The emission of the fluorescent complex was detected by a Shimadzu RF-10Axl fluorimeter with excitation and emission wavelengths set to 489 and 559 nm, respectively.

References Cited

Birchill, A. J., Milne, A., Woodward, E. M. S., Harris, C., Annett, A., Rusiecka, D., Achterberg E.P., Gledhill M., Ussher S.J., Worsfold P.J, Geibert W. and Lohan, M. C. (2017) Seasonal iron depletion in temperate shelf seas. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(17), 8987?8996. DOI: 10.1002/2017GL073881

Lohan M.C., Aguilar-Islas A.M., Bruland K.W. (2006) Direct determination of iron in acidified (pH 1.7) seawater samples by flow injection analysis with catalytic spectrophotometric detection: Application and intercomparison, Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 4, doi:10.4319/lom.2006.4.164

Nowicki J.L., Johnson K.S., Coale K., Elrod V.A., and Lieberman S.H. (1994) Determination of Zinc in Seawater Using Flow Injection Analysis with Fluorometric Detection. Analytical Chemistry 66. 2732-2738. 10.1021/ac00089a021.

Obata H.O., Karatani, H. and Nakayama E. (1993) Automated Determination of Iron in seawater by chelating resin concentration and chemiluminescence detection. Analytical Chemistry 65. 1524-1528. 10.1021/ac00059a007.

Rose A.L. and Waite T. (2002) Chemiluminescence of Luminol in the Presence of Iron(II) and Oxygen: Oxidation Mechanism and Implications for Its Analytical Use. Analytical chemistry. 73. 5909-20. 10.1021/ac015547q.

Obata H., Karatani, H., Matsui M. and Nakayama E. (1997) Fundamental studies for chemical speciation of iron in seawater with an improved analytical method. Marine Chemistry. 56. 97-106. 10.1016/S0304-4203(96)00082-5.

BODC Data Processing Procedures

Data received were loaded into the BODC database using established BODC data banking procedures. A parameter mapping table is provided below:

Originator's Variable Originator's Units BODC Parameter Code BODC Unit Comments
dFe nM DFEFICHL nmol/l -
Dfe SD nM DFEFICSD nmol/l -
TDFe nM FEXXCLDX nmol/l -
TDFe SD nM FESDCLDX nmol/l -
sFe nM SFEFICHL nmol/l -
sFe SD nM SFEFICSD nmol/l -
dZn nmol/kg CZI87001 nmol/kg -
dZn SD nmol/kg CZI87002 nmol/kg -
dAl nmol/kg ALYYFIP5 nmol/kg -
dAl SD nmol/kg ALSDFIP5 nmol/kg -

Project Information

Zinc, iron and phosphorous co-limitation in the Ocean: ZIPLOc

ZIPLOc is an 3 year project that aims to measure how zinc and phosphorous control biological activity in the North Atlantic subtropical gyre using novel measurement techniques. The observations made will be further explored using the latest modelling techniques over decadal timescales and in other basins.

The research aims to make an improvement in our overall understanding of how subtropical gyre ecosystems respond to ongoing climate change.

The project is led by the University of Liverpool, Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences and is a collaboration with the University of Southampton, School of Ocean and Earth Science. The project received funding from the Natural Environmental Research Council and runs between January 2017 and February 2020.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 2017-07-08
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) Ongoing
Organization Undertaking ActivityUniversity of Liverpool Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierJC150_UCCTD_CTD019T
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for JC150_UCCTD_CTD019T

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
1378097   10.00 1 1     5863.00 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 97  
1378100   10.00 2 2     5814.80 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 98  
1378103   10.00 3 3     5005.10 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 99  
1378106   10.00 4 4     4505.00 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 100  
1378109   10.00 5 5     4004.30 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 101  
1378112   10.00 6 6     3503.40 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 102  
1378115   10.00 7 7     3003.10 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 103  
1378118   10.00 8 8     2502.90 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 104  
1378121   10.00 9 9     2252.30 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 105  
1378124   10.00 10 10     2002.60 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 106  
1378127   10.00 11 11     1751.60 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 107  
1378130   10.00 12 12     1501.30 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 108  
1378133   10.00 13 13     1251.20 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 109  
1378136   10.00 14 14     1093.20 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 110  
1378139   10.00 15 15     1001.20 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 111  
1378142   10.00 16 16      900.90 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 112  
1378145   10.00 17 17      800.90 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 113  
1378148   10.00 18 18      700.80 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 114  
1378151   10.00 19 19      600.50 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 115  
1378154   10.00 20 20      300.40 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 116  
1378157   10.00 21 21      225.60 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 117  
1378160   10.00 22 22      160.00 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 118  
1378163   10.00 23 23      140.30 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 119  
1378166   10.00 24 24      100.10 Teflon-coated Niskin bottle No problem reported 120  

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Cruise

Cruise Name JC150 (GApr08, ZIPLOC)
Departure Date 2017-06-25
Arrival Date 2017-08-12
Principal Scientist(s)Claire Mahaffey (University of Liverpool Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences)
Ship RRS James Cook

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information


No Fixed Station Information held for the Series


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification