Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 475737
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problem Reports
No Problem Report Found in the Database
Data Access Policy
Public domain data
These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.
The recommended acknowledgment is
"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."
Narrative Documents
RRS Discovery 164 CTD Data Documentation
Introduction
This document covers the CTD data collected during RRS Discovery cruise 164 (19th December 1986 to 21st January 1987) under the direction of Dr R.T. Pollard from the Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Deacon Laboratory. The data were collected in the S Atlantic and SW Indian Ocean.
Instrumention
The instrument used was a Neil Brown Instrument Systems (NBIS) CTD, which measured pressure, temperature and conductivity. The CTD was used alongside a General Oceanics Rosette Multisampler with 12 Niskin bottles and a 10 kHz pinger. The sensors were flushed with distilled water on recovery. Bottle samples and reversing thermometer measurements were made on descent and the sea water samples were analysed using a Guildline Autolab Salinometer.
Reversing thermometers were calibrated before and after the cruise.
Sampling Protocol
Lowering and retrieval rates of 0.5 to 1.0 m/s were employed. All casts were full depth, most proceeding to within 10-30 m of the bottom.
Data were initially logged at 16 hz from the NBIS CTD onto an NBIS deck unit, which had been enhanced by IOS with an ASCII interface, allowing raw data to be written to a 1600 bpi 0.5 inch magnetic tape. Data are then passed to a microcomputer which edited and averaged the raw data to 1 hz, using algorithms developed by Pollard et al. (1986). All SMP messages from all instruments were archived using a Plessey 68000 and a UNIX based Plessey 68000 was available for further processing. CTD data were then analysed using editing, utility and display programs (Pollard, 1983). Further details of the processing can be found in Pollard et al. (1987).
Calibration
Pressure
Raw pressure R(raw) was calibrated to dbar P(cal) by the formula
P(cal) = 0.1 * P(raw) - 12.0
The pressure calibration was checked by comparing the CTD depth at the bottom of each cast with the value derived from the IOS Precision Echo Sounder. In total, 35 values fell within a Gaussian distribution which tailed off at 15m, and these values yielded:
D(pes) - D(ctd) = 0.4 +/- 6.3
From this it was deduced that pressures were therefore probably correct within a few decibars.
Temperature
CTD temperatures were calibrated at sea using the most recent laboratory calibration
T(C) = T(raw) * 0.0005 * 0.9990317 + 0.0258
which reinforced the long-term stability of the platinum resistor calibration. Reversing thermometers were deployed at two depths on all casts, to check for gross errors and, on the evidence gained, no change was made to the CTD temperature calibration.
Salinity
An overall correction of 0.050 given by all 165 values for casts 11404-58, with a standard deviation of 0.005, was applied. Casts 11401-03 were individually corrected by 0.027, 0.036 and 0.045 respectively. After cast 11458, a new conductivity sensor had to be installed, and calibration points available for casts 11459-61 were found to be unreliable. Therefore, a correction of -0.019 was applied to all three casts.
Oxygen
Offsets between up-casts and down-casts were minimised by replacing lagged temperature by unlagged CTD temperature. It was found that the calibration drifted enough that casts had to be fitted individually. Most CTD values were believed to be within 0.1 ml/l of their true value, or certainly 0.2 ml/l.
References
Pollard, R.T. 1983. PSTAR shipboard data processing programs. Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Marine Physics Group. (Unpublished manuscript)
Pollard, R.T., Holford, D., Ellis, S., Read, J.F. and Smithers, J. 1986.
CTD data from the Northeast Atlantic Ocean 37°-47° N, 10°-16° W collected on RRS Discovery Cruise 145 in late winter 1984. Institute of Oceanographic sciences, Report No. 223.
Pollard, R.T., Read, J.F., Smithers, J. 1987.
CTD sections across the Southwest Indian Ocean and Antarctic Circumpolar Current in Southern Summer 1986/7. Institute of Oceanographic sciences, Report No. 243.
Project Information
No Project Information held for the Series
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Cruise
Cruise Name | D164 |
Departure Date | 1986-12-19 |
Arrival Date | 1987-01-21 |
Principal Scientist(s) | Raymond T Pollard (Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Wormley Laboratory) |
Ship | RRS Discovery |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |