Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 87501
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problem Reports
Problems were encountered with the difference in response times between the temperature and conductivity sensors when the instrument passed through sharp thermoclines. In these cases, the conductivity channel has been heavily interpolated to produce a smooth salinity profile.
Data Access Policy
Public domain data
These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.
The recommended acknowledgment is
"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."
Narrative Documents
Neil Brown Smart Conductivity, Temperature and Depth profiler
The Smart CTD was developed by WHOI, Neil Brown Instrument Systems and MIT and consists of an internally recording CTD which can be programmable to accommodate various sampling schemes. The data retrieval is done via connectors to a computer, where it is digitally logged.
This instrument was designed to be used with minimal technical expertise and to be replaced if problems arise, rather than being repaired at sea.
RV Scotia 9/87 CTD Data Documentation
Introduction
Documentation for CTD data collected on R.V. Scotia Cruise 9/87 (9th - 29th September 1987) by the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland, Aberdeen, UK under the direction of E. Henderson.
Instrumentation
The instrument used was a Neil Brown Instrument Systems SMART CTD which logged data into its internal memory. Conductivity, temperature and pressure only were logged. The instrument has two modes of operation: either raw or averaged data can be collected. The former produces data at a rate of 5 scans/second and the latter 1 scan every 0.96sec. So far the instrument has always been used in the averaging mode. An EPROM in the instrument contains a routine which does the averaging, and also introduces the time lags required for matching the responses of the different sensors. The internal memory of the instrument is 40,000 scans of data.
Sampling
The CTD was lowered, at rates of between 30 and 40 metres/minute, (i.e. 1 scan approximately every metre) to within 5-10m of the sea floor (this depth being taken from soundings). Although CTD data were collected both on the downcast and the upcast; only the data from the downcast were used and compared with the bottle samples. The CTD data were then read back into the ship borne computer, an HP85, salinity was calculated and data plotted out to provide a quick look check on the data.
A calibration station (using reversing thermometers and water bottles) was taken every 4-5 CTD stations. CTDs and bottle samples may be taken at the same site; in which case the CTD cast was carried out first, and the bottle station immediately afterwards. This only occurred when the bottle stations were required for chemical data. The ship's winches are too close together to allow the two to be done simultaneously. At the hydrographic stations 2, 3 or 4 bottle samples were taken together with reversing thermometer measurements.
Calibration
The CTD is returned occasionally to the manufacturer in the USA for re-calibration at the factory. This was done in January 1985 and again in April 1988. At the factory the re-calibration is burnt into the EPROM. Memory is available on the EPROM for the addition of software for bench testing temperature and pressure, if required. However the CTD is not calibrated at DAFS as there is no calibration facility. Although there is little drift in the instrument, over a couple of years there is sufficient to warrant returning the instrument to the factory.
Data Processing
In the laboratory, the data were transferred onto a VAX 11/750 computer together with the header information from the log. Any spikes encountered were treated as follows:
- Spikes (less than 4 observations) were deleted, leaving a gap.
- Spikes of 4 or more observations were filled by interpolation.
Usually, for data below the thermocline a linear interpolation was applied. For data in the thermocline a cubic spline was employed.
Pressure, temperature and conductivity data values were supplied to BODC. Conductivity was converted to conductivity ratio and then converted to salinity using UNESCO recommended routines.
Reference
Fofonoff, N.P. and Millard Jr., R.C. (1983).
Algorithms for the computation of fundamental properties of sea water. UNESCO Technical Paper on Marine Science 44.
Project Information
No Project Information held for the Series
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Cruise
Cruise Name | 0987S |
Departure Date | 1987-09-09 |
Arrival Date | 1987-09-29 |
Principal Scientist(s) | J H Anthony Martin (Department of Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland Aberdeen Marine Laboratory) |
Ship | FRV Scotia |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |