Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2093495


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Niskin bottle  discrete water samplers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator Dr Reg Uncles
Originating Organization Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) LOIS River-Atmosphere-Coast Study (RACS)
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier CH99_CTD_TMXX_4:CTD82
BODC Series Reference 2093495
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1992-12-16 06:05
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 53.59541 N ( 53° 35.7' N )
Longitude 0.03518 E ( 0° 2.1' E )
Positional Uncertainty 0.05 to 0.1 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 4.8 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 4.8 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 5.2 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 5.2 m
Sea Floor Depth 10.0 m
Sea Floor Depth Source PEVENT
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Unspecified -
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
ALXXLGD21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of aluminium {Al CAS 7429-90-5} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.4/0.45um phase] by filtration and lumogallion fluorescence
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."


Narrative Documents

Niskin Bottle

The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.

Standard Niskin

The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.

Lever Action Niskin

The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.

Clean Sampling

A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.

Deployment

Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.

Dissolved and Particulate Trace Metals for TWEED campaign and RRS Challenger cruises.

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation.

Content of data series

AGCNICP2 Particulate silver content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
AGXXICP2 Particulate silver
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ALCNICP2 Particulate aluminium content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
ALXXICP2 Particulate aluminium
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ALXXLGD2 Dissolved aluminium
Lumogallion (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
BACNICP2 Particulate barium content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
BAXXICP2 Particulate barium
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CAXXAAP2 Particulate calcium
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CDCNAAP2 Particulate cadmium content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
CDCNICP2 Particulate cadmium content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
CDKDRDX2 Cadmium distribution coefficient
Radiotracer incubation in the dark: phases split by 0.4/0.45 µm pore filtration
Litres per kilogram
CDXXAAP2 Particulate cadmium
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXCVDX Dissolved cadmium
Cathodic stripping voltammetry (UV digested)
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXFXD2 Dissolved cadmium
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXICD2 Dissolved cadmium
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXICP2 Particulate cadmium
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
COCNICP2 Particulate cobalt content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
COXXAAP2 Particulate cobalt
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
COXXICP2 Particulate cobalt
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CSKDRDX2 Caesium distribution coefficient
Radiotracer incubation in the dark: phases split by 0.4/0.45 µm pore filtration
Litres per kilogram
CUCNAAP2 Particulate copper content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
CUCNICP2 Particulate copper content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
CUXXAAP2 Particulate copper
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXCVDX Dissolved copper
Cathodic stripping voltammetry (UV digested)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXFXD2 Dissolved copper
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXICD2 Dissolved copper
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXICP2 Particulate copper
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
FECNAAP2 Particulate total iron content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
FECNICP2 Particulate total iron content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
FEXXAAP2 Particulate total iron
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
FEXXFXD2 Dissolved total iron
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
FEXXICD2 Dissolved total iron
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
FEXXICP2 Particulate total iron
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
MNCNAAP2 Particulate total manganese content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
MNKDRDX2 Manganese distribution coefficient
Radiotracer incubation in the dark: phases split by 0.4/0.45 µm pore filtration
Litres per kilogram
MNXXAAP2 Particulate total manganese
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
MNXXFXD2 Dissolved total manganese
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
MNXXICD2 Dissolved total manganese
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
NICNAAP2 Particulate nickel content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
NICNICP2 Particulate nickel content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
NIXXCVDX Dissolved nickel
Cathodic stripping voltammetry (UV digested)
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXFXD2 Dissolved nickel
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXICD2 Dissolved nickel
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXICP2 Particulate nickel
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
PBCNAAP2 Particulate lead content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
PBCNICP2 Particulate lead content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
PBXXAAP2 Particulate lead
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
PBXXFXD2 Dissolved lead
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
PBXXICD2 Dissolved lead
Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
PBXXICP2 Particulate lead
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
SRCNICP2 Particulate strontium content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
SRXXICP2 Particulate strontium
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ZNCNAAP2 Particulate zinc content
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
ZNCNICP2 Particulate zinc content
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Parts per million
ZNKDRDX2 Zinc distribution coefficient
Radiotracer incubation in the dark: phases split by 0.4/0.45 µm pore filtration
Litres per kilogram
ZNXXAAP2 Particulate zinc
Acid leach then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ZNXXFXD2 Dissolved zinc
Solvent extraction of chelated metal then atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ZNXXICP2 Particulate zinc
Acid leach then ICP-MS (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre

Data Originator

Dr Reg Uncles, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK.

Sampling strategy and methodology

Tweed campaigns TWEED02, TWEED03, TWEED04, TWEED05, TWEED06, TWEED07, TWEED08, TWEED10, TWEED12 and TWEED13.
RRS Challenger cruises CH99, CH115B, CH115C and CH119A.

Challenger Dissolved Aluminium

Water samples were taken from either the CTD rosette or the ship's non-toxic supply. The samples were filtered through a 0.45-micron pore filter and aluminium was determined following complexation by lumogallion and fluorimetric determination of the Al complex (Hydes and Liss, 1976). All analytical work was undertaken on board ship.

Tweed Dissolved Trace Metals

The water samples were collected manually in acid-cleaned plastic bottles, filtered through 0.45-micron pore filters and acidified. Prior to analysis the samples were processed using the method of Danielsson et al. (1982) to remove interfering matrix. The modified samples were analysed using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS).

The data were supplied expressed as parts per billion (PPB), which is equivalent to ng/l. They were converted to nM at BODC through division by their atomic weights. The atomic weights used were 112.4 for cadmium, 63.55 for copper, 55.85 for iron, 207.2 for lead, 54.94 for manganese and 58.69 for nickel.

References

Achterberg, E. P. and van den Berg, C.M.G., 1994. Automated voltammetric system for shipboard determination of metal speciation in sea water. Anal. Chim. Acta 284, 463-471.

Colombo, C and van den Berg, C.M.G., 1997. Simultaneous determination of several trace metals in seawater using cathodic stripping voltammetry with mixed ligands. Anal. Chim. Acta 337, 29-40.

Heron, S.J. and Burton, J.D., 1987. Evaluation of a Spectrofluorimetric Method for Aluminium by Lumogallion. Final Report on Department of Environment Contract No. PECD 7/7/173. Department of Oceanography, University of Southampton. January 1987, 22 pp.

Hydes, D.J. and Liss, P.S., 1976. A fluorimetric method for the determination of low concentrations of dissolved aluminium in natural waters. Analyst 101, 922 931.

Morley, N.H., Statham P.J. and Fay, C., 1988. Design and use of a clean shipboard handling system for seawater samples. In: Advances in Underwater Technology, Ocean Science and Offshore Engineering, Volume 16 (Oceanology '88), Graham and Trotman, London, 283-290.

Nimmo, M., van den Berg, C.M.G. and Brown, J., 1989. The chemical speciation of dissolved nickel, copper, vanadium and iron in Liverpool Bay, Irish Sea. Coastal Shelf Res. 29, 57-74.

Pihlar, B., Valenta, P. and Nurnberg, H.W., 1981. New high-performance analytical procedure for the voltammetric determination of nickel in routine analysis of waters, biological materials and food. Fres. Z. Anal. Chem. 307, 337-346.

Tappin, A.D., Millward, G.E., Burton, J.D., Statham, P.J. and Morris, A.W., 1995. Trace metals in the central and southern North Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 41, 275-323.


Project Information

LOIS River-Atmosphere-Coast Study (LOIS - RACS)

Introduction

The Land-Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS) was a NERC research programme designed to study processes in the coastal zone. The Rivers, Atmosphere and Coasts Study (RACS) was a major component of LOIS that looked at land-sea interactions in the coastal zone and the major exchanges (physical, chemical and biological) between rivers and estuaries and the atmosphere. The study focused on the east coast of the UK from the Wash to the Tweed.

RACS included several sub-components

  • BIOTA - A study of salt marshes of the Humber and Wash
  • RACS (A) - An atmospheric chemistry study looking at air mass changes from the Wash into East Anglia
  • RACS (C) - A study of the estuaries, coasts and coastal waters between Great Yarmouth and Berwick upon Tweed.
    1. The coastal oceangraphic survey
    2. The Humber estuarine study
    3. The Tweed estuarine study
    4. The Holderness experiment
  • RACS (R) - A study of rivers that drain into the North Sea

RACS (A) was coordinated by the University of East Anglia and RACS (C) by the Plymouth Marine Laboratory.

RACS (A)

The bulk of the RACS (A) data set was collected during two field campaigns in the winter (October/November) of 1994 and the summer (May/June) of 1995. During these campaigns data were collected continuously from the University of East Anglia Atmospheric Observatory at Weybourne on the north Norfolk coast. An instrumented vessel was stationed offshore to provide a second sampling site to allow changes in a given air mass to be monitored. The Imperial College Jetstream research aircraft made one flight during each campaign to provide a link between the two surface stations. The Jetstream made four additional flights in 1996 and 1997.

RACS (C)

The coastal oceanographic survey

The coastal oceanographic data set was collected during a series of 17 RRS Challenger cruise legs. Most cruises covered two survey grids. One from Great Yarmouth to the Humber designed around the distribution of the sandbanks and a second simple zig-zag grid from the Humber to Berwick on Tweed. A large number of anchor stations, usually over one or two tidal cycles, were worked in the area of the Humber mouth or the Holderness coast.

The Humber estuarine study

The Humber estuarine data set was collected during a series of 33 campaigns on the Environment Agency vessels Sea Vigil and Water Guardian in the Humber, Trent and Ouse river systems at approximately monthly intervals between June 1993 and December 1996. Each campaign consisted of two or three one-day cruises. The tracks covered the estuary from the tidal limits of both Trent and Ouse to Spurn Point. Instrumental and sample data are available from a series of fixed stations that were sampled during every campaign.

The Tweed estuarine study

The Tweed estuarine data set was collected during a series of 13 campaigns using RV Tamaris in association with a rigid inflatable vessel at approximately monthly intervals between July 1996 and July 1997. Each campaign covered the tidal reaches of the River Tweed.

The Holderness experiment

The Holderness Experiment was designed to monitor the process of sediment transport along the Holderness coastline. It consisted of three moored instrument deployments during the winters of 1993-1994, 1994-1995 and 1995-1996. Mooring platforms were deployed at eight stations along two lines off the Holderness coast. A northerly and a southerly line of four stations each were used (N1 - N4 and S1 to S4) with the lowest numbers being inshore. Both lines were approximately perpendicular to the coast, although the S4 station lay to the south of the S line, off Spurn Head.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1992-12-16
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1992-12-16
Organization Undertaking ActivityPlymouth Marine Laboratory
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierCH99_CTD_CTD82
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for CH99_CTD_CTD82

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
364179   10.00        6.00    6.20    4.80 Niskin bottle No problem reported    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Cruise

Cruise Name CH99
Departure Date 1992-12-07
Arrival Date 1992-12-21
Principal Scientist(s)Alan W Morris (Plymouth Marine Laboratory)
Ship RRS Challenger

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information

Fixed Station Information

Station NameLOIS RACS anchor station HAS1/SG23
CategoryOffshore location
Latitude53° 35.40' N
Longitude0° 2.22' E
Water depth below MSL

LOIS (RACS) anchor station HAS2/SG23

Several anchor stations were worked by the LOIS RACS Challenger cruises with the ship at anchor for periods of between 12 and 24 hours. The anchor station designations are of something of a mixed bag. Some correspond to stations on either the Humber-Wash (HW) or Humber-Tweed (HT) grids, the N and S stations are mooring site designations for the RACS Holderness Experiment and the SG station designations were unique to Challenger cruise CH119A.

HAS2, also know as SG23, is an anchor station at position 53.59°N, 0.037°E worked during the Challenger cruises CH99 and CH119A (no CTD profiles were collected during CH119A).

BODC image

On most cruises the ship's instruments (including nutrients) monitored the surface water from the non-toxic supply. In addition, CTD profiles were collected at regular intervals at each anchor station, however the sampling strategy varied from cruise to cruise. Typically, the minimum coverage was a CTD cast every hour with water samples taken from the rosette, however sometimes additional casts without water sampling were taken to increase the sampling frequency to every 30 minutes or even 15 minutes.

Related Fixed Station activities are detailed in Appendix 1


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: LOIS RACS anchor station HAS1/SG23

Related series for this Fixed Station are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
844638CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 20:29:0053.5955 N, 0.03533 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093354Water sample data1992-12-15 20:31:3053.59549 N, 0.0354 ERRS Challenger CH99
844454CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 20:58:0053.596 N, 0.03533 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093366Water sample data1992-12-15 20:59:3053.59601 N, 0.03529 ERRS Challenger CH99
844466CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 21:28:0053.5955 N, 0.03583 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093378Water sample data1992-12-15 21:30:3053.59553 N, 0.03581 ERRS Challenger CH99
844651CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 21:58:0053.59567 N, 0.03633 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093391Water sample data1992-12-15 22:00:0053.59563 N, 0.03634 ERRS Challenger CH99
844663CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 22:27:0053.59567 N, 0.03633 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093409Water sample data1992-12-15 22:30:3053.5956 N, 0.03639 ERRS Challenger CH99
844675CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 22:58:0053.59483 N, 0.03733 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093410Water sample data1992-12-15 23:01:0053.59488 N, 0.03736 ERRS Challenger CH99
844687CTD or STD cast1992-12-15 23:28:0053.59483 N, 0.0365 ERRS Challenger CH99
844699CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 00:01:0053.59433 N, 0.03683 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093422Water sample data1992-12-16 00:05:0053.59438 N, 0.03679 ERRS Challenger CH99
844706CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 00:32:0053.5945 N, 0.03667 ERRS Challenger CH99
2094161Water sample data1992-12-16 00:34:3053.59455 N, 0.03675 ERRS Challenger CH99
844718CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 00:59:0053.5945 N, 0.03683 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093434Water sample data1992-12-16 01:02:3053.59452 N, 0.03681 ERRS Challenger CH99
844731CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 01:37:0053.59467 N, 0.03683 ERRS Challenger CH99
844743CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 02:02:0053.59467 N, 0.03633 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093446Water sample data1992-12-16 02:05:0053.59465 N, 0.03637 ERRS Challenger CH99
844755CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 02:32:0053.5945 N, 0.03633 ERRS Challenger CH99
844478CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 03:01:0053.5945 N, 0.0365 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093458Water sample data1992-12-16 03:05:0053.59446 N, 0.03644 ERRS Challenger CH99
844491CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 03:32:0053.5945 N, 0.03683 ERRS Challenger CH99
844282CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 04:02:0053.5955 N, 0.03667 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093471Water sample data1992-12-16 04:05:0053.59555 N, 0.03671 ERRS Challenger CH99
844509CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 04:32:0053.5955 N, 0.03617 ERRS Challenger CH99
844510CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 05:01:0053.59583 N, 0.03567 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093483Water sample data1992-12-16 05:05:0053.59591 N, 0.03559 ERRS Challenger CH99
844522CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 05:31:0053.5955 N, 0.03567 ERRS Challenger CH99
844534CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 06:00:0053.59533 N, 0.03517 ERRS Challenger CH99
844036CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 06:32:0053.59533 N, 0.035 ERRS Challenger CH99
844048CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 06:59:0053.5955 N, 0.03533 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093502Water sample data1992-12-16 07:02:0053.59555 N, 0.03533 ERRS Challenger CH99
844546CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 07:32:0053.59533 N, 0.03517 ERRS Challenger CH99
2094185Water sample data1992-12-16 07:35:0053.59532 N, 0.0352 ERRS Challenger CH99
844061CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 08:02:0053.5955 N, 0.035 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093514Water sample data1992-12-16 08:05:0053.5955 N, 0.03498 ERRS Challenger CH99
844073CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 08:32:0053.59567 N, 0.0355 ERRS Challenger CH99
844085CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 09:00:0053.59583 N, 0.0355 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093526Water sample data1992-12-16 09:05:0053.59575 N, 0.03553 ERRS Challenger CH99
844558CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 09:29:0053.59533 N, 0.03533 ERRS Challenger CH99
844097CTD or STD cast1992-12-16 11:39:0053.595 N, 0.037 ERRS Challenger CH99
2093538Water sample data1992-12-16 11:42:0053.59494 N, 0.03697 ERRS Challenger CH99