Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2094437


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Lever Action Niskin Bottle  discrete water samplers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator Dr Peter Statham
Originating Organization University of Southampton Department of Oceanography (now University of Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Science)
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) OMEX I
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier DI216_CTD_TMXX_8:CTD43
BODC Series Reference 2094437
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1995-09-10 02:46
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 47.96051 N ( 47° 57.6' N )
Longitude 9.68256 W ( 9° 41.0' W )
Positional Uncertainty 0.05 to 0.1 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 604.2 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 2346.9 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 68.5 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 1811.2 m
Sea Floor Depth 2415.4 m
Sea Floor Depth Source PEVENT
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Unspecified -
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
ALXXLGD21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of aluminium {Al CAS 7429-90-5} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate <0.4/0.45um phase] by filtration and lumogallion fluorescence
ALXXLGTX1Nanomoles per litreConcentration of aluminium {Al CAS 7429-90-5} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by lumogallion fluorescence
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Public domain data

These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.

The recommended acknowledgment is

"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."


Narrative Documents

Niskin Bottle

The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.

Standard Niskin

The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.

Lever Action Niskin

The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.

Clean Sampling

A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.

Deployment

Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.

Dissolved and Colloidal Trace Metals for cruises Belgica BG9309 and BG9322, Charles Darwin CD84 and RRS Discovery DI216

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation.

Content of data series

ALXXLGD2 Dissolved aluminium
Lumogallion (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ALXXLGTX Dissolved + reactive particulate aluminium
Lumogallion (unfiltered)
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXFXC1 Colloidal cadmium
Difference between freon extract/AA analyses on 0.4 µm pore and 104 Dalton filtered water
Nanomoles per litre
CDXXFXD2 Dissolved cadmium
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
COXXFXD2 Dissolved cobalt
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXCVDX Dissolved copper
Cathodic stripping voltammetry (UV digested)
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXFXC1 Colloidal copper
Difference between freon extract/AA analyses on 0.4 µm pore and 104 Dalton filtered water
Nanomoles per litre
CUXXFXD2 Dissolved copper
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
FEXXFXC1 Colloidal total iron
Difference between freon extract/AA analyses on 0.4 µm pore and 104 Dalton filtered water
Nanomoles per litre
FEXXFXD2 Dissolved total iron
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
MNXXFXD2 Dissolved total manganese
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXCVDX Dissolved nickel
Cathodic stripping voltammetry (UV digested)
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXFXC1 Colloidal nickel
Difference between freon extract/AA analyses on 0.4 µm pore and 104 Dalton filtered water
Nanomoles per litre
NIXXFXD2 Dissolved nickel
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
PBXXFXD2 Dissolved lead
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre
ZNXXFXD2 Dissolved zinc
Freon extract/atomic absorption (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Nanomoles per litre

Data Originator

Dr Peter Statham, Southampton Oceanography Centre, UK.

Sampling strategy and methodology

Trace metal clean procedures developed for open ocean work were used throughout the sample collection and processing. Seawater samples were filtered directly from the CTD rosette bottles (Teflon lined GoFlo on cruises BG9309, BG9322A and CD84: lever-action Niskin bottles on cruises CD94 and DI216) under about 1 bar nitrogen pressure through acid-cleaned 0.4 micron Nuclepore filters mounted in PTFE holders.

Samples were acidified by addition of 1 ml sub-boiling distilled HNO3 per litre of seawater (except samples for Al analysis) and stored in acid-cleaned (Morley et al. 1988) low density polythene bottles.

This was undertaken using the specialised clean facilities in the Department of Oceanography, University of Southampton and (from 1994) Southampton Oceanography Centre. Dissolved metals were extracted and pre-concentrated following the dithiocarbamate complexation-freon extraction method of Danielsson et al. (1982), as modified by Statham (1985) and Tappin (1988), and were determined by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry (GFAAS). Within batch analytical precision of the method is generally less than 10% (coefficient of variation) for each metal. More details of the method are given in Tappin et al. (1992).

Quality control (i.e. accuracy and between batch analytical precision) of the data was assessed by regularly analysing aliquots of the CASS-1 coastal seawater reference sample for dissolved trace metals and a bulk filtered acidified sea water sample which was used for batch-to-batch quality control. Results of these analyses were satisfactory, with very few exceptions, and ensure that the data are of high quality.

The method used for aluminium analysis by Peter Statham's student (Ruth Parker) on Discovery 216 is exactly as described below for David Hydes and Lei Chou.

Comments on data quality

Charles Darwin cruise CD84

In the second OMEX annual report, IBM reported that an intercalibration exercise between IBM and SOC on this cruise showed the IBM Cd concentrations to be about 20% higher, Cu determinations from both laboratories to be virtually identical and IBM Ni determinations to be lower.

A small number of very high values in both the IBM and SOC data sets that may only be explained in terms of contamination have been flagged suspect ('M') by BODC. Other values flagged 'M' which otherwise look reasonable are from bottles for which there is strong evidence of contamination of deep water samples by shallow water through leakage.

A number of data values in the ULB aluminium data set have been flagged either 'L' or 'M' in the database. The data values flagged 'L' were reported as contaminated by the originator. The values flagged 'M' are from bottles where there is strong evidence of contamination of deep water samples by shallow water through leakage.

Discovery cruise DI216

A number of data values in the ULB aluminium data set have been flagged either 'L' or 'M' in the database. The data values flagged 'L' were reported as contaminated by the originator. The values flagged 'M' are from bottles where there is strong evidence of contamination of deep water samples by shallow water through leakage.

References

Achterberg, E. P. and van den Berg, C. M. G., 1994. Automated voltammetric system for shipboard determination of metal speciation in sea water. Anal. Chim. Acta 284, 463-471.

Colombo, C and van den Berg, C. M. G., 1997. Simultaneous determination of several trace metals in seawater using cathodic stripping voltammetry with mixed ligands. Anal. Chim. Acta 337, 29-40.

Danielsson, L.G., Magnusson, B., Westerlund, S. and Zhang, K., 1982. Trace metal determination in estuarine waters by electrothermal AAS after extraction of dithiocarbamate complexes into freon. Anal. Chim. Acta, 144, 183-188.

Hydes, D.J. and P.S. Liss, 1976. A fluorometric method for the determination of low concentrations of dissolved aluminium in natural waters. The Analyst, 101, 922-931.

Mills, G.L., McFadden, E. and Quinn, J.G., 1987. Chromatographic studies of dissolved organic matter and copper-organic complexes isolated from estuarine waters. Mar. Chem., 20, 313-323.

Morley, N.H., Fay, C.W., and Statham, P.J., 1988. Design and use of a clean shipboard handling system for seawater samples. Advances in Underwater Technology, Ocean Science and Offshore Engineering, 16, Oceanology '88, 283-289.

Nimmo, M., van den Berg, C. M. G. and Brown, J., 1989. The chemical speciation of dissolved nickel, copper, vanadium and iron in Liverpool Bay, Irish Sea. Coastal Shelf Res. 29, 57-74.

Pihlar, B., Valenta, P. and Nurnberg, H. W., 1981. New high-performance analytical procedure for the voltammetric determination of nickel in routine analysis of waters, biological materials and food. Fres. Z. Anal. Chem. 307, 337-346.

Statham, P.J., 1985. The determination of dissolved manganese and cadmium in sea water at low nmol l-1 concentrations by chelation and extraction followed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta, 169, 149-159.

Tappin, A.D., 1988 Trace metals in shelf seas of the British Isles, Ph.D.Thesis, University of Southampton, 279pp.

Tappin A.D., D.J. Hydes, P.J. Statham and Burton, J.D., 1992. Concentrations, distributions and seasonal variability of dissolved Cd, Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn in the English Channel. Continental Shelf Research, 12,.


Project Information

Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) I

Introduction

OMEX was a European multidisciplinary oceanographic research project that studied and quantified the exchange processes of carbon and associated elements between the continental shelf of western Europe and the open Atlantic Ocean. The project ran in two phases known as OMEX I (1993-1996) and OMEX II - II (1997-2000), with a bridging phase OMEX II - I (1996-1997). The project was supported by the European Union under the second and third phases of its MArine Science and Technology Programme (MAST) through contracts MAS2-CT93-0069 and MAS3-CT97-0076. It was led by Professor Roland Wollast from Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium and involved more than 100 scientists from 10 European countries.

Scientific Objectives

The aim of the Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) project was to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring at the ocean margins in order to quantify fluxes of energy and matter (carbon, nutrients and other trace elements) across this boundary. The research culminated in the development of quantitative budgets for the areas studied using an approach based on both field measurements and modeling.

OMEX I (1993-1996)

The first phase of OMEX was divided into sub-projects by discipline:

  • Physics
  • Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Biological Processes
  • Benthic Processes
  • Carbon Cycling and Biogases

This emphasises the multidisciplinary nature of the research.

The project fieldwork focussed on the region of the European Margin adjacent to the Goban Spur (off the coast of Brittany) and the shelf break off Tromsø, Norway. However, there was also data collected off the Iberian Margin and to the west of Ireland. In all a total of 57 research cruises (excluding 295 Continuous Plankton Recorder tows) were involved in the collection of OMEX I data.

Data Availability

Field data collected during OMEX I have been published by BODC as a CD-ROM product, entitled:

  • OMEX I Project Data Set (two discs)

Further descriptions of this product and order forms may be found on the BODC web site.

The data are also held in BODC's databases and subsets may be obtained by request from BODC.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1995-09-10
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1995-09-10
Organization Undertaking ActivityUniversity of Southampton Department of Oceanography (now University of Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Science)
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierDI216_CTD_CTD43
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for DI216_CTD_CTD43

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
553682   10.00     1950.60 1952.90 1924.30 Lever Action Niskin Bottle No problem reported    
553683   10.00     1506.10 1508.60 1487.20 Lever Action Niskin Bottle No problem reported    
553684   10.00     1121.00 1123.80 1107.90 Lever Action Niskin Bottle No problem reported    
553685   10.00      611.60  613.10  604.20 Lever Action Niskin Bottle No problem reported    
553686   10.00      409.40  410.20  403.80 Niskin bottle No problem reported    
553817   10.00     2380.60 2384.10 2346.90 Lever Action Niskin Bottle Leakage contamination    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1

Cruise

Cruise Name D216
Departure Date 1995-08-26
Arrival Date 1995-09-12
Principal Scientist(s)Peter J Statham (University of Southampton Department of Oceanography)
Ship RRS Discovery

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information


No Fixed Station Information held for the Series


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: DI216_CTD_CTD43

Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
1256827Water sample data1995-09-10 02:46:0047.96051 N, 9.68256 WRRS Discovery D216
2124637Water sample data1995-09-10 02:46:0047.96051 N, 9.68256 WRRS Discovery D216
2129691Water sample data1995-09-10 02:46:0047.96051 N, 9.68256 WRRS Discovery D216