Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2137586
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition of BOTTFLAG | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOTTFLAG | Definition |
---|---|
0 | The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC. |
1 | The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material. |
2 | Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling. |
3 | The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired. |
4 | During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes. |
5 | Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered. |
6 | The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery. |
7 | Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist). |
8 | There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample. |
9 | The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage. |
Definition of Rank |
|
|
Problem Reports
No Problem Report Found in the Database
Data Access Policy
Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."
Narrative Documents
Niskin Bottle
The Niskin bottle is a device used by oceanographers to collect subsurface seawater samples. It is a plastic bottle with caps and rubber seals at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, allowing free-flushing of the bottle as it moves through the water column.
Standard Niskin
The standard version of the bottle includes a plastic-coated metal spring or elastic cord running through the interior of the bottle that joins the two caps, and the caps are held open against the spring by plastic lanyards. When the bottle reaches the desired depth the lanyards are released by a pressure-actuated switch, command signal or messenger weight and the caps are forced shut and sealed, trapping the seawater sample.
Lever Action Niskin
The Lever Action Niskin Bottle differs from the standard version, in that the caps are held open during deployment by externally mounted stainless steel springs rather than an internal spring or cord. Lever Action Niskins are recommended for applications where a completely clear sample chamber is critical or for use in deep cold water.
Clean Sampling
A modified version of the standard Niskin bottle has been developed for clean sampling. This is teflon-coated and uses a latex cord to close the caps rather than a metal spring. The clean version of the Levered Action Niskin bottle is also teflon-coated and uses epoxy covered springs in place of the stainless steel springs. These bottles are specifically designed to minimise metal contamination when sampling trace metals.
Deployment
Bottles may be deployed singly clamped to a wire or in groups of up to 48 on a rosette. Standard bottles and Lever Action bottles have a capacity between 1.7 and 30 L. Reversing thermometers may be attached to a spring-loaded disk that rotates through 180° on bottle closure.
Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) and Particulate Organic Nitrogen (PON) measurements from CTD bottle samples collected during CROZEX cruises D285 and D286
Originator's Protocol for Data Acquisition and Analysis
CTD stations were sampled for Particulate Organic Carbon (POC) and Particulate Organic Nitrogen (PON) using a Sea-Bird 911plus CTD fitted with 24 Niskin bottles. All samples (expect station 15496) originated from the stainless steel CTD casts. Note that on the D286 in particular, Thorium CTD casts generated their own Chlorophyll-a and POC samples.
For each CTD deployment 12 standard depths down to 500 m were sampled. Size-fractionated samples were also routinely collected from two depths, normally at 10 m and the Chlorophyll-a maximum (between 40-80 m). The state variables were size-fractionated into total, 20µm and 2µm fractions, with a 10 µm fraction being added during D286. The POC samples were frozen on-board at -20°C and transported back to University of Cape Town (UCT) to be acid-fumed to remove particulate inorganic carbon (PIC), dried and pelleted in preparation for running on a CHN analyser at the National Oceanography Centre Southampton (NOCS).
Total POC and PON
Samples were filtered onto pre-ashed 25 mm GF/F filters by low vacuum (300-400 hPa) filtration. The volumes used for filtration were dependent on the amount of phytoplankton present at each station. Stations with high concentrations, especially of Phaeocystis, required lower volumes in order to prevent the filters from clogging. Typical volumes filtered were 1 litre for the upper mixed layer and 2 litres below. Filters were placed in labelled petri-dishes and stored at -20°C. These samples were analysed at NOCS.
Size fractionated POC and PON
For each specified depth, 2 litres was filtered through a 20 µm mesh sieve. 1 litre of the <20 µm particle water was collected onto an ashed GF/F to obtain a <20 µm fraction. The remaining 1 litre was filtered through a 2 µm polycarbonate membrane filter and the collected water was then filtered onto an ashed GF/F to obtain a <2 µm fraction. ilters were placed in labelled petri-dishes and stored at -20°C. These samples were analysed at NOCS.
BODC Data Processing Procedures
The data were provided in one excel file and were loaded into the BODC database using established data banking procedures. Note that no instrumentation detection limits were provided by the originators. The following table shows how the variables were mapped to appropriate BODC parameter codes:
Originator's Parameter | Unit | Description | BODC Parameter Code | BODC Unit | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
POC total | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon >GF/F | CORGCAP1 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 12. |
POC <2 | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon <2 | - | - | Not loaded. Can be calculated using the total and fractionated POC data. Note that there were no quality issues with these. |
POC 2-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon 2-20 µm | CORG2S20 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 12. |
POC 2-10 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon 2-10 µm | CORGCAP2 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 12. |
POC 10-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon 10-20 µm | CORGCA10 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 12. |
POC >20µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of particulate organic carbon >20µm | CORGCA20 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 12. |
PON total | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen >GF/F | NTOTCNP1 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 14. |
PON <2 | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen <2 | - | - | Not loaded. Can be calculated using the total and fractionated PON data. Note that there were no quality issues with these. |
PON 2-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen µm | NTOTCZ02 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 14. |
PON 2-10 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen 2-10 µm | NTOTCNP2 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 14. |
PON 10-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen 10-20 µm | NTOTCN10 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 14. |
PON >20 | µg l-1 | Concentration of Particulate Organic Nitrogen >20 | NTOTCN20 | µMoles l-1 | Units converted from µg l-1 to µMoles l-1 by dividing by 14. |
Chl-a total | µg l-1 | Concentration of chlorophyll-a >GF/F | - | - | Loaded separately. |
Chl-a 2-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of chlorophyll-a 2-20 µm | - | - | Loaded separately. |
Chl-a >20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of chlorophyll-a >20 µm | - | - | Loaded separately. |
Chl-a 2-10 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of chlorophyll-a 2-10 µm | - | - | Loaded separately. |
Chl-a 10-20 µm | µg l-1 | Concentration of chlorophyll-a 10-20 µm | - | - | Loaded separately. |
Data Quality Report
Some data quality issues were identified by the originator and have been flagged. In addition, any negative values not flagged by the originator were flagged by BODC.
Problem Report
None (BODC assessment).
Project Information
CROZet natural iron bloom EXport experiment (CROZEX)
The multidisciplinary CROZet natural iron bloom EXport experiment (CROZEX) was a major component of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) funded core strategic project Biophysical Interactions and Controls over Export Production (BICEP). The project is the first planned natural iron fertilisation experiment to have been conducted in the Southern Ocean.
The overall objective of CROZEX was to examine, from surface to sediment, the structure, causes and consequences of a naturally occurring phytoplankton bloom in the Southern Ocean. The Crozet Plateau was chosen as the study area. This area typically exhibits two phytoplankton blooms a year, a primary bloom in that peaks in October and a secondary bloom in December or January. Specific aims with respect to these were to:
- Determine what limits the primary bloom
- Determine the cause of the secondary bloom
The project was run by the George Deacon Division (GDD), now Ocean Biogeochemistry and Ecosystems (OBE) at the National Oceanography Centre Southampton (NOCS). Participants from five other university departments also contributed to the project.
The project ran from November 2004 to January 2008 with marine data collection between 3rd November 2004 and 21st January 2005. There were 2 cruises to the Crozet Islands Plateau, which are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1: Details of the RRS Discovery CROZEX cruises.
Cruise No. | Dates |
---|---|
D285 | 3rd November 2004 - 10th December 2004 |
D286 | 13th December 2004 - 21st January 2005 |
The two cruises aimed to survey two areas at different phases of the bloom cycle described above. A control area to the south of the Crozet Islands, which is classified as High Nutrient Low Chorophyll (HNLC), where the blooms do not occur and a second area in the region of the blooms to the north of the Crozet Islands.
Sampling was undertaken at ten major stations (see Pollard et al., 2007) numbered M1 to M10. The following observations/sampling were conducted at each station where possible:
- Several CTD casts sampling:
- Iron (using a titanium rig)
- 234Th
- Physical parameters (temperature, salinity etc)
- Oxygen
- CO2
- Nutrients using a stainless steel rig including a Lowered Acoustic Doppler Current Profiller (LADCP)
- At each thorium cast there was an associated Stand Alone Pump System (SAPS) deployment
- At some stations, a drifting PELAGRA trap was deployed for the duration of the work
- Megacoring was undertaken at M5 and M6
- Gravity coring was undertaken at M5, M6 and M10
- Longhurst Hardy Plankton Recorder (LPHR) tows were undertaken at a few major stations
For each of the major stations (M1 to M10), the following were determined:
- Primary productivity
- New Production
- Phytoplankton community composition
- Bacterial activity
- Iron
- Nutrient drawdown
- Thorium export
Sampling between major stations included:
- SeaSoar runs instrumented with:
- CTD
- Optical Plankton Counter (OPC)
- Fast Repetition Rate fluorimeter (FRRf)
- Physics CTD casts on several lines
- Argo float deployments
- Zooplankton nets at nearly every CTD and major station
- Underway and on-station CO2 measurements
- Underway nutrients and radium sampling
- 5 to 6 day ship-board iron-addition incubation experiments
- Checks against near-real-time satellite and model data
- Mooring deployments based on the satellite imagery in support of the CROZET (Benthic CROZEX) project.
The CROZEX cruises included 6 extra days in support of the CROZET (Benthic CROZEX) project, whose main cruise took place one year after the CROZEX cruises. The CROZET work undertaken during the CROZEX cruises was primarily the moored sediment trap deployments, although some of the coring work is applicable to both projects.
CROZEX produced significant findings in several disciplines, including confirmation that iron from Crozet fertilised the bloom and that phytoplankton production rates and most export flux estimates were much larger in the bloom area than the HNLC area (Pollard et al. 2007). Many of the project results are presented in a special CROZEX issue of Deep-Sea Research II (volume 54, 2007).
References
Pollard R., Sanders R., Lucas M. and Statham P., 2007. The Crozet natural iron bloom and export experiment (CROZEX). Deep-Sea Research II, 54, 1905-1914.
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Data Activity
Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 2004-12-20 |
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 2004-12-20 |
Organization Undertaking Activity | Southampton Oceanography Centre (now National Oceanography Centre, Southampton) |
Country of Organization | United Kingdom |
Originator's Data Activity Identifier | D286_CTD_15562 |
Platform Category | lowered unmanned submersible |
BODC Sample Metadata Report for D286_CTD_15562
Sample reference number | Nominal collection volume(l) | Bottle rosette position | Bottle firing sequence number | Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) | Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) | Depth of sampling point (m) | Bottle type | Sample quality flag | Bottle reference | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
173622 | 20.00 | 1 | 1 | 2941.10 | 2942.10 | 2897.60 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173623 | 20.00 | 2 | 2 | 2842.70 | 2843.70 | 2801.30 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173624 | 20.00 | 3 | 3 | 2537.80 | 2538.80 | 2502.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173625 | 20.00 | 4 | 4 | 2437.00 | 2438.00 | 2403.90 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173626 | 20.00 | 5 | 5 | 2028.00 | 2029.00 | 2002.40 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173627 | 20.00 | 6 | 6 | 1519.30 | 1520.30 | 1502.10 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173628 | 20.00 | 7 | 7 | 1265.60 | 1266.60 | 1252.10 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173629 | 20.00 | 8 | 8 | 1012.20 | 1013.20 | 1002.10 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173630 | 20.00 | 9 | 9 | 759.50 | 760.50 | 752.50 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173631 | 20.00 | 10 | 10 | 507.80 | 508.80 | 503.60 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173632 | 20.00 | 11 | 11 | 406.30 | 407.30 | 403.10 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173633 | 20.00 | 12 | 12 | 305.50 | 306.50 | 303.30 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173634 | 20.00 | 13 | 13 | 255.00 | 256.00 | 253.30 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173635 | 20.00 | 14 | 14 | 205.10 | 206.10 | 203.80 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173636 | 20.00 | 15 | 15 | 179.70 | 180.70 | 178.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173637 | 20.00 | 16 | 16 | 153.30 | 154.30 | 152.50 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173638 | 20.00 | 17 | 17 | 128.90 | 129.90 | 128.30 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173639 | 20.00 | 18 | 18 | 102.90 | 103.90 | 102.50 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173640 | 20.00 | 19 | 19 | 81.90 | 82.90 | 81.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173641 | 20.00 | 20 | 20 | 61.80 | 62.80 | 61.80 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173642 | 20.00 | 21 | 21 | 41.50 | 42.50 | 41.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173643 | 20.00 | 22 | 22 | 21.60 | 22.60 | 21.90 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173644 | 20.00 | 23 | 23 | 11.30 | 12.30 | 11.70 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported | ||
173645 | 20.00 | 24 | 24 | 6.40 | 7.40 | 6.80 | Niskin bottle | No problem reported |
Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.
Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1
Cruise
Cruise Name | D286 |
Departure Date | 2004-12-13 |
Arrival Date | 2005-01-21 |
Principal Scientist(s) | Richard Sanders (Southampton Oceanography Centre) |
Ship | RRS Discovery |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |
Appendix 1: D286_CTD_15562
Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.
If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.
Series Identifier | Data Category | Start date/time | Start position | Cruise |
---|---|---|---|---|
2144141 | Water sample data | 2004-12-20 21:14:30 | 44.52843 S, 49.96009 E | RRS Discovery D286 |