Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2298324


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Stand-alone pump  sieves and filters
Instrument Mounting research vessel
Originating Country Belgium
Originator Prof Lei Lei
Originating Organization Free University of Brussels, Laboratory of Chemical Oceanography and Water Geochemistry
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) OMEX I
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier CD94_SAP_PCPN_14:SAP6
BODC Series Reference 2298324
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1995-06-17 06:02
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 47.41172 N ( 47° 24.7' N )
Longitude 7.26862 W ( 7° 16.1' W )
Positional Uncertainty 0.1 to 0.5 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 100.0 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 150.0 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 1699.5 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 1749.5 m
Sea Floor Depth 1849.5 m
Sea Floor Depth Source PEVENT
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Variable common depth - All sensors are grouped effectively at the same depth, but this depth varies significantly during the series
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
Sea Floor Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number
SICNICP21PercentConcentration of silicon {Si CAS 7440-21-3} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration, acid digestion and inductively-coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Public domain data

These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.

The recommended acknowledgment is

"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."


Narrative Documents

Stand Alone Pump (SAP)

A submersible battery powered water pump that sucks water through various filters leaving the materials of interest on the filter for analysis. SAPs are deployed clamped to a hydrographic wire and may be used to sample at depths of up to 6000 m. A SAP can pump thousands of litres of water over a few hours.

Particulate Organic Carbon, Inorganic Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Silica for cruises Belgica BG9309, BG9322, BG9412 and BG9506

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation.

Content of data series

CINGWLP1 Particulate inorganic carbon
Weight loss on acidification (GF/F filtered)
Micromoles/litre
CORGCAP1 Particulate organic carbon (acidified)
Acid fumed then C/N analyser (GF/F filtered)
Micromoles/litre
CORGCAP4 Particulate organic carbon (acidified)
Acid fumed then C/N analyser (30 m pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
CORGCNP3 Particulate organic carbon (unacidified)
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (GF/C filtered)
Micromoles/litre
ICCNCNP2 Inorganic carbon content (filtered SPM)
Difference between C/N analyser results on total and acidified samples (0.4/0.45 m pore filtered)
Per cent
ICCNCNPC Inorganic carbon content (centrifuged SPM)
Difference between C/N analyser results on total and acidified samples (centrifuged)
Per cent
NTOTCNP1 Particulate total nitrogen ("PON")
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (GF/F filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTOTCNP4 Particulate total nitrogen ("PON")
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (30 m pore filtered)
Micromoles/litre
NTOTCNP3 Particulate total nitrogen ("PON")
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (GF/C filtered)
Micromoles/litre
OCCNCAP1 Organic carbon content (GF/F filtered SPM)
Acidification then carbon/nitrogen analyser (GF/F filtered)
Per cent
OCCNCAP2 Organic carbon content (0.45 micron pore filtered SPM)
Acidification then carbon/nitrogen analyser (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
OCCNCAPC Organic carbon content (centrifuged SPM)
Acidification then carbon/nitrogen analyser (centrifuged)
Per cent
OPALWCP7 Particulate opaline silica
NaOH hydrolysis of material trapped on a cellulose acetate filter
Micromoles/litre
TNCNCNP2 Total nitrogen content (0.45 micron pore filtered SPM)
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (0.4/0.45 µm pore filtered)
Per cent
TNCNCNPC Total nitrogen content (centrifuged SPM)
Carbon/nitrogen analyser (centrifuged)
Per cent
TPHSWCP3 Particulate total phosphorus
Oxidation then autoanalysis (GF/C filtered)
Micromoles/litre

Data Originator

Dr Lei Chou ,ULB, Brussels, Belgium.

Sampling strategy and methodology

Samples were obtained using one of two protocols. The protocol used may be identified by the gear code in the EVENT entry for the data (SAP or GPCENT).

SAP collection

Challenger Oceanics in-situ stand-alone pumps (SAPs) were used to sample particulate material. The instruments are operated by a programmable timer to ensure that the pump only operates when in position at the desired depth. Membrane filters with a 0.4 micron pore size were used to collect the particulate material.

On recovery the filters were rinsed and dried in clean conditions.

GPCENT collection.

Suspended particulate matter was collected by continuous flow centrifugation using an Alpha-Laval oil purifier (model MAB 104) specially coated for oceanographic use. Water supply was adjusted to approximately 1 cubic metre per hour. Samples were collected both when the ship was on station and steaming between stations for about 6-10 hours.

Samples were taken from the centrifuge body using a stainless steel spatula, stored in acid-washed PET vials and immediately deep frozen. After weighing (wet weight) the sample was subdivided for C/N, trace metal and isotope analysis.

If sufficient material was available, a sample for carbon and nitrogen determination was acidified to remove carbonates and then assayed in an Interscience NA-2000 elemental particulate analyser.

Inorganic carbon content was determined where sufficient material was available by analysing both acidified and unacidified samples and computing the difference.

Comments on data quality

Comparison of the carbon and nitrogen contents between the centrifuged samples and shallow SAP samples was possible at two stations. The values compared well.

Both ULB and Liege determined organic carbon and total nitrogen content on the centrifuged samples. An intercalibration of the two data sets by BODC showed excellent agreement. Regressing one data set against the other gave the following results:

Carbon ULB = 1.0051 * Liege + 0.7038 (R2 = 92%; n=37)
Nitrogen ULB = 1.0062 * Liege + 0.225 (R2 = 90%; n=34)

References

Etcheber, H., 1981. Comparison des diverses méthodes d'evaluation des teneurs en matières en suspension et en carbone organique particulaire des eaux marines du plateau continental aquitan. Journ. Rech. Oceanogr., Paris VI, 2:37-42.

Kattner, G. and Brockmann, U., 1980. Semi-automated methods for the determination of particulate phosphorus in the marine environment. Fresenius Z. anal. Chem., 301, 14-357.

Strickland, J.D.H., Parsons, T.R. (1972). A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.,.167-311.

Thomsen. L., Graf, G., Martens, V. and Steen, E., 1994. An instrument for sampling water from the bottom nepheloid layer. Contin. Shelf Res., 14, 871-882.

Thomsen, L. and Graf, G., 1995. Benthic boundary layer characteristics of the continental margin of the western Barents Sea. Oceanologica Acta, 17/6, 597-607.


Project Information

Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) I

Introduction

OMEX was a European multidisciplinary oceanographic research project that studied and quantified the exchange processes of carbon and associated elements between the continental shelf of western Europe and the open Atlantic Ocean. The project ran in two phases known as OMEX I (1993-1996) and OMEX II - II (1997-2000), with a bridging phase OMEX II - I (1996-1997). The project was supported by the European Union under the second and third phases of its MArine Science and Technology Programme (MAST) through contracts MAS2-CT93-0069 and MAS3-CT97-0076. It was led by Professor Roland Wollast from Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium and involved more than 100 scientists from 10 European countries.

Scientific Objectives

The aim of the Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) project was to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring at the ocean margins in order to quantify fluxes of energy and matter (carbon, nutrients and other trace elements) across this boundary. The research culminated in the development of quantitative budgets for the areas studied using an approach based on both field measurements and modeling.

OMEX I (1993-1996)

The first phase of OMEX was divided into sub-projects by discipline:

  • Physics
  • Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Biological Processes
  • Benthic Processes
  • Carbon Cycling and Biogases

This emphasises the multidisciplinary nature of the research.

The project fieldwork focussed on the region of the European Margin adjacent to the Goban Spur (off the coast of Brittany) and the shelf break off Tromsø, Norway. However, there was also data collected off the Iberian Margin and to the west of Ireland. In all a total of 57 research cruises (excluding 295 Continuous Plankton Recorder tows) were involved in the collection of OMEX I data.

Data Availability

Field data collected during OMEX I have been published by BODC as a CD-ROM product, entitled:

  • OMEX I Project Data Set (two discs)

Further descriptions of this product and order forms may be found on the BODC web site.

The data are also held in BODC's databases and subsets may be obtained by request from BODC.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1995-06-17
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1995-06-17
Organization Undertaking ActivityUniversity of Southampton Department of Oceanography (now University of Southampton School of Ocean and Earth Science)
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierCD94_SAP_SAP6
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for CD94_SAP_SAP6

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
560528            400.00 Stand-alone pump No problem reported    
560529            150.00 Stand-alone pump No problem reported    
560530            100.00 Stand-alone pump No problem reported    
560531             20.00 Stand-alone pump No problem reported    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1

Cruise

Cruise Name CD94
Departure Date 1995-06-03
Arrival Date 1995-06-20
Principal Scientist(s)Peter J Statham (University of Southampton Department of Oceanography)
Ship RRS Charles Darwin

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information


No Fixed Station Information held for the Series


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: CD94_SAP_SAP6

Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
2298293Water sample data1995-06-17 06:02:3047.41172 N, 7.26862 WRRS Charles Darwin CD94