Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 579912


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Hydrography time series at depth
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Aanderaa RCM 4/5 temperature and salinity recorders  water temperature sensor; salinity sensor
Instrument Mounting subsurface mooring
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator -
Originating Organization Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Bidston Laboratory (now National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool)
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) North Sea Project 1987-1992
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier AA7570.C43AC
BODC Series Reference 579912
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1989-01-03 00:19
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1989-02-06 05:49
Nominal Cycle Interval 600.0 seconds
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 55.49420 N ( 55° 29.7' N )
Longitude 0.90770 E ( 0° 54.5' E )
Positional Uncertainty 0.1 to 0.5 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 84.2 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 84.2 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 0.8 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 0.8 m
Sea Floor Depth 85.0 m
Sea Floor Depth Source -
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Fixed common depth - All sensors are grouped effectively at the same depth which is effectively fixed for the duration of the series
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Sea floor reference - Depth measured as a height above sea floor but converted into a depth relative to the sea surface according to the same datum as used for sea floor depth (applicable to instrument depths not bathymetric depths)
Sea Floor Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
AADYAA011DaysDate (time from 00:00 01/01/1760 to 00:00 UT on day)
AAFDZZ011DaysTime (time between 00:00 UT and timestamp)
CNDCPR011Siemens per metreElectrical conductivity of the water body by in-situ conductivity cell
DEPHPR011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body by profiling pressure sensor and conversion to seawater depth using UNESCO algorithm
PSALPR011DimensionlessPractical salinity of the water body by conductivity cell and computation using UNESCO 1983 algorithm
TEMPPR011Degrees CelsiusTemperature of the water body

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."


Narrative Documents

Aanderaa Recording Current Meter Model 4/5

Manufacturer's specifications: Meter (recording unit: height 51cm, diameter 12.8cm, vane size 37x100cm; overall: length 137cm, height 75cm) is designed for depths down to 2000m (6000m RCM model 5). It incorporates a spindle which is shackled into the mooring line. The meter is attached to the spindle through a gimbal mounting which permits a maximum 27° deviation of the spindle from the vertical, the meter still remaining horizontal.

Meter comprises :-

  1. Savonius rotor magnetically coupled to an electronic counter - the number of revolutions during the sampling interval giving the average current speed over the interval - starting speed 2cm/s (users find 1.5 to 3cm/s), range 2.5 to 250cm/s, accuracy greater of 1cm/s or 2 per cent.

  2. Vane, which aligns instrument with current flow, has a balance weight ensuring static balance and tail fins to ensure dynamic balance in flows up to 250cm/s.

  3. Magnetic compass (needle is clamped to potentiometer ring at instant of sampling only) - direction recorded with 0.35° resolution, 5° accuracy (1.5° claimed by MAFF, Lowestoft) for speeds 5 to 100cm/s, 7.5° accuracy for remaining speeds within 2.5 to 200cm/s range, maximum compass tilt (i.e. maximum deviation of the meter from the horizontal at which the meter still registers correctly) is 12° in both pitch and roll axes.

  4. Quartz clock, accuracy better than 2sec/day within temperature range 0 to 20°C.

  5. Thermistor (temperature sensor), standard range -2.46 to 21.48°C (max on high range 36.04°C), accuracy 0.15°C, resolution 0.1 per cent of range, 63 per cent response time 12sec.

  6. Inductive cell conductivity sensor (optional), range 0 to 70mmho/cm standard resolution 0.1 per cent of range.

  7. Bourdon tube pressure sensor (optional) driving a potentiometer - range 0 to 100, 200, 500, 1000 or (RCM4 to 3000psi), (RCM5 to 5000, or 8000psi), lowest calibrated pressure 14.24psi, accuracy 1 per cent of range, resolution 0.1 per cent of range.

  8. Self balancing potentiometer which converts the output from each sensor into a 10 bit binary number for storage on magnetic tape.

  9. Associated electronics.

Sample duration equals nominal interval between data cycles pre-chosen as 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 60 or 180 minutes. Sample recording order: meter reference number, temperature, (conductivity, pressure if installed), current direction, speed.

Manufacturer's calibration formulae:

Meters (manufactured prior to October 1974) with analogue measurement of speed, i.e. the Savonius rotor drives a potentiometer via a magnetically coupled follower and gearbox (6000 : 1 gear ratio):

speed = 1.5 + 246 * (M/T) cm/s (1)

meters with digital measurement of speed i.e. utilizing an electronic reed switch to count the total number of rotor revolutions during the sampling interval:

speed = 1.5 + 42 * B * (M/T) cm/s (2)

all meters:
direction = 1.5 + 0.349N ° magnetic (3)

where
B is the number of rotor revolutions per count, M (bits) binary is the count over the sampling interval T (sec) and N (bits) binary is the direction reading.

Note:
Data collecting laboratories may calibrate their own meters and so not use the manufacturer's calibration equations.

Aanderaa Current Meter Data Processing

Data Originator's Processing

The following procedures are carried out before the data were supplied to BODC.

Data were downloaded from the instrument logger, and factory calibrations were applied to the current speed channel, and the pressure, conductivity and temperature channels when fitted. Where available, laboratory calibrations of the current direction channels were used; factory formulae were used in their absence. Where no form factor was known for the conductivity sensor, a value of 2.8 was used.

Please note (concerns vector averaged current data): The current data are averaged by the logger over the sampling interval, whereas the pressure, temperature and conductivity data are single point measurements taken at the end of the interval. The data originator has moved the time stamps to the mid-point of the vector averaging sampling interval for all channels without interpolation.

BODC Data Processing and Quality Control

Where pressure sensors were fitted: the data record was compared with the pressure computed from the water depth on deployment and rig geometry. The time series was visually screened for evidence of rig movement (e.g. trawling) and excessive leaning (perhaps due to strong currents).

Where temperature sensors were fitted: the data record was compared with calibrated CTD data taken in the vicinity and checked for agreement within a few tenths of a degree Celsius. Obvious spikes were flagged. Periods of excessively noisy data were noted.

Where conductivity sensors were fitted: salinity (PSS-78) was computed from in-situ temperature and conductivity and a nominal pressure computed from the water depth on deployment and rig geometry. Obvious spikes were flagged.

General Data Screening carried out by BODC

BODC screen both the series header qualifying information and the parameter values in the data cycles themselves.

Header information is inspected for:

  • Irregularities such as unfeasible values
  • Inconsistencies between related information, for example:
    • Times for instrument deployment and for start/end of data series
    • Length of record and the number of data cycles/cycle interval
    • Parameters expected and the parameters actually present in the data cycles
  • Originator's comments on meter/mooring performance and data quality

Documents are written by BODC highlighting irregularities which cannot be resolved.

Data cycles are inspected using time or depth series plots of all parameters. Currents are additionally inspected using vector scatter plots and time series plots of North and East velocity components. These presentations undergo intrinsic and extrinsic screening to detect infeasible values within the data cycles themselves and inconsistencies as seen when comparing characteristics of adjacent data sets displaced with respect to depth, position or time. Values suspected of being of non-oceanographic origin may be tagged with the BODC flag denoting suspect value; the data values will not be altered.

The following types of irregularity, each relying on visual detection in the plot, are amongst those which may be flagged as suspect:

  • Spurious data at the start or end of the record.
  • Obvious spikes occurring in periods free from meteorological disturbance.
  • A sequence of constant values in consecutive data cycles.

If a large percentage of the data is affected by irregularities then a Problem Report will be written rather than flagging the individual suspect values. Problem Reports are also used to highlight irregularities seen in the graphical data presentations.

Inconsistencies between the characteristics of the data set and those of its neighbours are sought and, where necessary, documented. This covers inconsistencies such as the following:

  • Maximum and minimum values of parameters (spikes excluded).
  • The occurrence of meteorological events.

This intrinsic and extrinsic screening of the parameter values seeks to confirm the qualifying information and the source laboratory's comments on the series. In screening and collating information, every care is taken to ensure that errors of BODC making are not introduced.


Project Information

North Sea Project

The North Sea Project (NSP) was the first Marine Sciences Community Research project of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). It evolved from a NERC review of shelf sea research, which identified the need for a concerted multidisciplinary study of circulation, transport and production.

The ultimate aim of the NERC North Sea Project was the development of a suite of prognostic water quality models to aid management of the North Sea. To progress towards water quality models, three intermediate objectives were pursued in parallel:

  • Production of a 3-D transport model for any conservative passive constituent, incorporating improved representations of the necessary physics - hydrodynamics and dispersion;
  • Identifying and quantifying non-conservative processes - sources and sinks determining the cycling and fate of individual constituents;
  • Defining a complete seasonal cycle as a database for all the observational studies needed to formulate, drive and test models.

Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory hosted the project, which involved over 200 scientists and support staff from NERC and other Government funded laboratories, as well as seven universities and polytechnics.

The project ran from 1987 to 1992, with marine field data collection between April 1988 and October 1989. One shakedown (CH28) and fifteen survey cruises (Table 1), each lasting 12 days and following the same track, were repeated monthly. The track selected covered the summer-stratified waters of the north and the homogeneous waters in the Southern Bight in about equal lengths together with their separating frontal band from Flamborough head to Dogger Bank, the Friesian Islands and the German Bight. Mooring stations were maintained at six sites for the duration of the project.

Table 1: Details of NSP Survey Cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date
CH28 29/04/88 - 15/05/88
CH33 04/08/88 - 16/08/88
CH35 03/09/88 - 15/09/88
CH37 02/10/88 - 14/10/88
CH39 01/11/88 - 13/11/88
CH41 01/12/88 - 13/12/88
CH43 30/12/88 - 12/01/89
CH45 28/01/89 - 10/02/89
CH47 27/02/89 - 12/03/89
CH49 29/03/89 - 10/04/89
CH51 27/04/89 - 09/05/89
CH53 26/05/89 - 07/06/89
CH55 24/06/89 - 07/07/89
CH57 24/07/89 - 06/08/89
CH59 23/08/89 - 04/09/89
CH61 21/09/89 - 03/10/89

Alternating with the survey cruises were process study cruises (Table 2), which investigated some particular aspect of the science of the North Sea. These included fronts (nearshore, circulation and mixing), sandwaves and sandbanks, plumes (Humber, Wash, Thames and Rhine), resuspension, air-sea exchange, primary productivity and blooms/chemistry.

Table 2: Details of NSP Process cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date Process
CH34 18/08/88 - 01/09/88 Fronts - nearshore
CH36 16/09/88 - 30/09/88 Fronts - mixing
CH56 08/07/89 - 22/07/89 Fronts - circulation
CH58 07/08/89 - 21/08/89 Fronts - mixing
CH38 24/10/88 - 31/10/88 Sandwaves
CH40 15/11/88 - 29/11/88 Sandbanks
CH42 15/12/88 - 29/12/88 Plumes/Sandbanks
CH46 12/02/89 - 26/02/89 Plumes/Sandwaves
CH44 13/01/89 - 27/01/89 Resuspension
CH52 11/05/89 - 24/05/89 Resuspension
CH60 06/09/89 - 19/09/89 Resuspension
CH48 13/03/89 - 27/03/89 Air/sea exchanges
CH62 05/10/89 - 19/10/89 Air/sea exchanges
CH50 12/04/89 - 25/04/89 Blooms/chemistry
CH54 09/06/89 - 22/06/89 Production

In addition to the main data collection period, a series of cruises took place between October 1989 and October 1990 that followed up work done on previous cruises (Table 3). Process studies relating to blooms, plumes (Humber, Wash and Rhine), sandwaves and the flux of contaminants through the Dover Strait were carried out as well as two `survey' cruises.

Table 3: Details of NSP `Follow up' cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date Process
CH62A 23/10/89 - 03/11/89 Blooms
CH64 03/04/90 - 03/05/90 Blooms
CH65 06/05/90 - 17/05/90 Humber plume
CH66A 20/05/90 - 31/05/90 Survey
CH66B 03/06/90 - 18/06/90 Contaminants through Dover Strait
CH69 26/07/90 - 07/08/90 Resuspension/Plumes
CH72A 20/09/90 - 02/10/90 Survey
CH72B 04/10/90 - 06/10/90 Sandwaves/STABLE
CH72C 06/10/90 - 19/10/90 Rhine plume

The data collected during the observational phase of the North Sea Project comprised one of the most detailed sets of observations ever undertaken in any shallow shelf sea at that time.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1989-01-03
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1989-02-06
Organization Undertaking ActivityInstitute of Oceanographic Sciences Bidston Laboratory (now National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool)
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierC43AC
Platform Categorysubsurface mooring

North Sea Project Data Activity: POLRIG#C43AC

Deployment

This rig was deployed as part of the NERC North Sea Project Survey at Station A. The rig was trawled on 06/02/89.

Rig position 55 ° 29.65N 0 ° 54.46E
Water depth 85m

Rig Description

The mooring contained two instruments, an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) and an Aanderaa (RCM4) current meter. These were mounted on a frame positioned on the sea bed, which was equipped with an IOS acoustic release.

Instrument Meter height Parameters measured
RCM4 A7570 0.8m Conductivity, temperature and pressure
ADCP D0007 0.8m Corrupt data

Fixed Station Information

Fixed Station Information

Station NameNSP Survey A and CTD Site CS
CategoryOffshore location
Latitude55° 30.00' N
Longitude0° 54.00' E
Water depth below MSL85.0 m

North Sea Project Survey Mooring Site A and CTD Site CS

Site A was one of six fixed stations where moorings were deployed during the North Sea Project survey. This location is also one of 123 North Sea Project CTD Sites.

The site was characterised by weak tidal currents, up to a maximum of 0.5 m/s, and the water column was stratified in summer months.

The rigs deployed here lie within a box bounded by co-ordinates 55.493N 0.893E at the southwest corner and 55.563N 0.920E at the northeast corner. Magnetic variation at this site was 4.5° west.

Site A deployment history is summarised below:

Rig ID Meter type Meter height Start date Data return (days) Comment
C33AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

12/08/88

12/08/88

0.0

29.5

Data corrupt

N/A

C33AT THCH   12/08/88 29 Good data
C35AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

10/09/88

10/09/88

0.0

29.3

Data corrupt

N/A

C35AT THCH   10/09/88 30 Good data
C37AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

10/10/88

10/10/88

29.1

29.1

 
C37AT THCH   10/10/88 30 Good data
C39AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

10/11/88

10/11/88

0.0

0.0

Meter lost

Meter lost

C39AT THCH   08/11/88 31 Good data
C43AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

03/01/89

03/01/89

0.0

34.2

Data corrupt

Rig trawled 06/02/89

C47AC ADCP 0.8m 06/03/89 30.7 No CM deployed
C49AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

08/04/89

08/04/89

25.8

0.0

N/A

Data corrupt

C49AT THCH   06/04/89 30 Good data
C49AF FL 76.5 m 06/04/89 29 Instrument height suspect
C51AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

04/05/89

04/05/89

28.0

28.6

 
C51AT THCH   04/05/89 29 Good data
C51AF FL 76.5 m 04/05/89 29 Instrument height suspect
C53AC ADCP 0.8m 02/06/89 28.8 No CM deployed
C53AT THCH   02/06/89 29 Good data
C55AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

01/07/89

01/07/89

33.5

33.5

 
C57AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

04/08/89

04/08/89

4.8

4.8

Rig trawled 09/08/89

Rig trawled 09/08/89

C57AT THCH   04/08/89 21 Good data
C59AC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

30/08/89

30/08/89

29.6

0.0

N/A

Data corrupt

C59AT THCH   30/08/89 30 Good data

ADCP = Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
CM = Current Meter (Aanderaa or S4)
THCH = Thermistor Chain
FL = Fluorometer

Related Fixed Station activities are detailed in Appendix 1


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: NSP Survey A and CTD Site CS

Related series for this Fixed Station are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
781629CTD or STD cast1988-05-13 18:34:0052.41667 N, 2.99017 ERRS Challenger CH28
769679CTD or STD cast1988-08-12 06:31:0055.5015 N, 0.90483 ERRS Challenger CH33
579900Hydrography time series at depth1988-08-12 07:40:0455.4993 N, 0.9 ENot applicable
604787Hydrography time series at depth1988-08-12 08:31:5255.5067 N, 0.8983 ENot applicable
769680CTD or STD cast1988-08-12 09:47:0055.50617 N, 0.89983 ERRS Challenger CH33
769920CTD or STD cast1988-08-14 05:23:0055.50017 N, 0.89883 ERRS Challenger CH33
783777CTD or STD cast1988-09-10 21:27:0055.50583 N, 0.898 ERRS Challenger CH35
604855Hydrography time series at depth1988-09-10 22:41:1755.5075 N, 0.893 ENot applicable
579997Hydrography time series at depth1988-09-10 22:50:0455.4987 N, 0.9015 ENot applicable
783789CTD or STD cast1988-09-10 22:56:0055.497 N, 0.9005 ERRS Challenger CH35
784639CTD or STD cast1988-10-10 03:47:0055.496 N, 0.89733 ERRS Challenger CH37
784640CTD or STD cast1988-10-10 04:35:0055.49733 N, 0.89533 ERRS Challenger CH37
604843Hydrography time series at depth1988-10-10 09:20:3655.5137 N, 0.9052 ENot applicable
579948Hydrography time series at depth1988-10-10 09:30:0055.5057 N, 0.9052 ENot applicable
603944Currents -subsurface Eulerian1988-10-10 09:38:4955.5057 N, 0.9052 ENot applicable
821990CTD or STD cast1988-11-08 13:57:0055.497 N, 0.9015 ERRS Challenger CH39
604831Hydrography time series at depth1988-11-08 15:30:0755.5622 N, 0.9115 ENot applicable
822213CTD or STD cast1988-11-10 17:39:0055.50067 N, 0.90167 ERRS Challenger CH39
785422CTD or STD cast1988-12-09 03:11:0055.49817 N, 0.8965 ERRS Challenger CH41
786216CTD or STD cast1989-01-02 23:06:0055.499 N, 0.90083 ERRS Challenger CH43
793041CTD or STD cast1989-03-06 19:02:0055.49383 N, 0.8965 ERRS Challenger CH47
1857782Water sample data1989-03-06 19:07:0055.49387 N, 0.89657 ERRS Challenger CH47
793053CTD or STD cast1989-03-06 19:29:0055.49467 N, 0.89983 ERRS Challenger CH47
1857794Water sample data1989-03-06 19:32:0055.49463 N, 0.89988 ERRS Challenger CH47
603888Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-03-06 21:18:4355.4933 N, 0.8953 ENot applicable
794289CTD or STD cast1989-04-06 10:04:0055.5125 N, 0.90283 ERRS Challenger CH49
1858969Water sample data1989-04-06 10:09:0055.51245 N, 0.90281 ERRS Challenger CH49
794290CTD or STD cast1989-04-06 13:55:0055.49783 N, 0.90767 ERRS Challenger CH49
1858970Water sample data1989-04-06 13:59:0055.49791 N, 0.9077 ERRS Challenger CH49
611446Fluorescence or pigments1989-04-06 16:39:0055.5 N, 0.905 ENot applicable
604775Hydrography time series at depth1989-04-06 16:40:3855.5 N, 0.9057 ENot applicable
794308CTD or STD cast1989-04-06 17:11:0055.502 N, 0.92333 ERRS Challenger CH49
1858982Water sample data1989-04-06 17:16:0055.50195 N, 0.92326 ERRS Challenger CH49
794542CTD or STD cast1989-04-08 20:56:0055.49683 N, 0.90117 ERRS Challenger CH49
1859229Water sample data1989-04-08 21:01:0055.49689 N, 0.90119 ERRS Challenger CH49
603796Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-04-08 23:38:3455.4993 N, 0.9188 ENot applicable
795397CTD or STD cast1989-05-04 21:50:0055.5025 N, 0.90217 ERRS Challenger CH51
1861222Water sample data1989-05-04 22:03:0055.50246 N, 0.90224 ERRS Challenger CH51
611458Fluorescence or pigments1989-05-04 22:46:0055.5 N, 0.92 ENot applicable
604818Hydrography time series at depth1989-05-04 23:18:5255.498 N, 0.9107 ENot applicable
579936Hydrography time series at depth1989-05-04 23:30:0355.4998 N, 0.92 ENot applicable
795404CTD or STD cast1989-05-04 23:48:0055.49917 N, 0.89783 ERRS Challenger CH51
2083697Water sample data1989-05-05 00:01:4355.49921 N, 0.89781 ERRS Challenger CH51
2096352Water sample data1989-05-05 00:01:4355.49921 N, 0.89781 ERRS Challenger CH51
2097299Water sample data1989-05-05 00:01:4355.49921 N, 0.89781 ERRS Challenger CH51
1861234Water sample data1989-05-05 00:02:0055.49921 N, 0.89781 ERRS Challenger CH51
603919Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-05-05 09:18:4755.4998 N, 0.92 ENot applicable
796769CTD or STD cast1989-06-02 15:16:0055.49583 N, 0.911 ERRS Challenger CH53
1863787Water sample data1989-06-02 15:24:0055.49588 N, 0.91107 ERRS Challenger CH53
796770CTD or STD cast1989-06-02 17:55:0055.50017 N, 0.9005 ERRS Challenger CH53
1863799Water sample data1989-06-02 18:01:0055.50024 N, 0.90044 ERRS Challenger CH53
604806Hydrography time series at depth1989-06-02 19:22:3055.5003 N, 0.901 ENot applicable
603852Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-06-02 19:28:5255.4993 N, 0.8987 ENot applicable
796782CTD or STD cast1989-06-02 19:30:0055.4995 N, 0.89733 ERRS Challenger CH53
1863806Water sample data1989-06-02 19:37:0055.49948 N, 0.89733 ERRS Challenger CH53
798069CTD or STD cast1989-07-01 15:47:0055.50483 N, 0.90417 ERRS Challenger CH55
1656985Water sample data1989-07-01 15:54:0055.50478 N, 0.9042 ERRS Challenger CH55
1866263Water sample data1989-07-01 15:54:0055.50478 N, 0.9042 ERRS Challenger CH55
591671Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-07-01 16:38:0055.4998 N, 0.9053 ENot applicable
603839Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-07-01 16:38:3555.4998 N, 0.9053 ENot applicable
799602CTD or STD cast1989-08-04 03:47:0055.4975 N, 0.909 ERRS Challenger CH57
1865260Water sample data1989-08-04 03:51:0055.49747 N, 0.90897 ERRS Challenger CH57
799614CTD or STD cast1989-08-04 04:08:0055.49883 N, 0.90217 ERRS Challenger CH57
1246439Water sample data1989-08-04 04:13:0055.49884 N, 0.90209 ERRS Challenger CH57
1709895Water sample data1989-08-04 04:13:0055.49884 N, 0.90209 ERRS Challenger CH57
1865272Water sample data1989-08-04 04:13:0055.49884 N, 0.90209 ERRS Challenger CH57
604799Hydrography time series at depth1989-08-04 05:19:2255.5017 N, 0.9117 ENot applicable
603803Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-08-04 05:38:2555.5017 N, 0.905 ENot applicable
591658Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-08-04 05:39:0055.5017 N, 0.905 ENot applicable
801940CTD or STD cast1989-08-30 15:46:0055.50217 N, 0.917 ERRS Challenger CH59
1856649Water sample data1989-08-30 15:53:0055.50223 N, 0.91704 ERRS Challenger CH59
604867Hydrography time series at depth1989-08-30 16:28:0855.5017 N, 0.92 ENot applicable
603968Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-08-30 16:48:4555.501 N, 0.9127 ENot applicable
802193CTD or STD cast1989-09-01 15:32:0055.49883 N, 0.89917 ERRS Challenger CH59
1856883Water sample data1989-09-01 15:38:0055.49878 N, 0.89912 ERRS Challenger CH59
800592CTD or STD cast1989-09-29 04:41:0055.49833 N, 0.905 ERRS Challenger CH61
2087822Water sample data1989-09-29 04:47:4455.49841 N, 0.90497 ERRS Challenger CH61
1855370Water sample data1989-09-29 04:48:0055.49841 N, 0.90497 ERRS Challenger CH61
803319CTD or STD cast1990-05-28 17:51:0055.49733 N, 0.89833 ERRS Challenger CH66A
805105CTD or STD cast1990-09-30 05:25:0055.501 N, 0.8965 ERRS Challenger CH72A