Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 895313
Metadata Summary
Problem Reports
Data Access Policy
Narrative Documents
Project Information
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Fixed Station Information
BODC Quality Flags
SeaDataNet Quality Flags
Metadata Summary
Data Description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Data Identifiers |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Co-ordinates(UT) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spatial Co-ordinates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameters |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problem Reports
No Problem Report Found in the Database
Data Access Policy
Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."
Narrative Documents
BODC Processing
BODC Processing
The data arrived at BODC in Matlab binary .txt format. The file was over 2 MB in size and was at a resolution of 8Hz. The size of the file presented some problems to processing. Firstly the BODC BUDs system was used to interpret the data into 10 minute intervals. The file then underwent further processing by converting to qxf format following BODC samples schema transfer procedures and using BODC generated Matlab code. BODC parameter codes are used to map the variables measured. Below is a table showing the parameter mapping.
Variable | Units | BODC Parameter Code | Units | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cond 1 | mS/cm | CNDCPR01 | S/m | Values divided by 10 |
Cond2 | mS/cm | CNDCPR02 | S/m | Values divided by 10 |
Cond3 | mS/m | CNDCZZ01 | S/m | Values divided by 10 |
Temp1 | deg C | TEMPPR01 | deg C | - |
Temp2 | deg C | TEMPPR02 | deg C | - |
Temp3 | deg C | TEMPPR03 | deg C | - |
The data were screened using BODC's in-house EDSERPLO visualisation software.
General Data Screening carried out by BODC
BODC screen both the series header qualifying information and the parameter values in the data cycles themselves.
Header information is inspected for:
- Irregularities such as unfeasible values
- Inconsistencies between related information, for example:
- Times for instrument deployment and for start/end of data series
- Length of record and the number of data cycles/cycle interval
- Parameters expected and the parameters actually present in the data cycles
- Originator's comments on meter/mooring performance and data quality
Documents are written by BODC highlighting irregularities which cannot be resolved.
Data cycles are inspected using time or depth series plots of all parameters. Currents are additionally inspected using vector scatter plots and time series plots of North and East velocity components. These presentations undergo intrinsic and extrinsic screening to detect infeasible values within the data cycles themselves and inconsistencies as seen when comparing characteristics of adjacent data sets displaced with respect to depth, position or time. Values suspected of being of non-oceanographic origin may be tagged with the BODC flag denoting suspect value; the data values will not be altered.
The following types of irregularity, each relying on visual detection in the plot, are amongst those which may be flagged as suspect:
- Spurious data at the start or end of the record.
- Obvious spikes occurring in periods free from meteorological disturbance.
- A sequence of constant values in consecutive data cycles.
If a large percentage of the data is affected by irregularities then a Problem Report will be written rather than flagging the individual suspect values. Problem Reports are also used to highlight irregularities seen in the graphical data presentations.
Inconsistencies between the characteristics of the data set and those of its neighbours are sought and, where necessary, documented. This covers inconsistencies such as the following:
- Maximum and minimum values of parameters (spikes excluded).
- The occurrence of meteorological events.
This intrinsic and extrinsic screening of the parameter values seeks to confirm the qualifying information and the source laboratory's comments on the series. In screening and collating information, every care is taken to ensure that errors of BODC making are not introduced.
Originator's Processing
The AML CT Logger measures conductivity and temperature from its three sensor heads. Bench testing at POL showed that the system was working in autonomous mode using SyncGen1 to supply timing triggers. The CT Logger was also set-up to accept power from a POL designed external alkaline battery pack instead of its normal internal and external lithium cell battery packs. The internal lithium battery pack was removed for saftey and recycling as were the cells in the external battery pack. The existing short aluminium cased external battery pack used for the old STD12plus CT logger, was adapted to power the CT Logger system.
The CT Logger was set to sample at 8 Hz due to a minimum response time for the temperature sensors of 0.1 seconds.
Project Information
Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory Dee Experiment
Introduction
Sediment transport process models are a vital tool in allowing scientists to predict sediment transport and forecast seabed and coastal morphodynamic evolution. It is however, difficult to obtain accurate models due to the complex inter-dependence of sediment processes in the bottom boundary layer. This inter-dependence is governed by interactions between the sediment transport triad; the bed, the hydrodynamics and the mobile sediments.
Scientific Objectives
- To use a varying suite of instruments to make co-located measurements of the sediment triad
- To provide a framework to allow assessment and improvement of the latest sediment transport models
- To address dynamics of suspended sediments in terms of supply of material to the coastal zone from estuaries
- Development of a new description of suspended sediment and water opacity to improve simulation of coastal primary productivity
Fieldwork
The study site chosen by POL for this research was the Dee Estuary, Liverpool Bay. POL performed fieldwork in the Hilbre Channel on the eastern side of the Estuary and the Welsh Channel on the western exit of the Estuary, with emphasis placed on two repeat stations, HC and WC. The fieldwork started in February 2005 and has been summarised below:
Cruise | Dates | Hilbre Channel | Welsh Channel |
---|---|---|---|
PD03_05 | 2005-02-03 to 2005-02-04 | 25 hour CTD station 3 x mooring deployments | 13 hour CTD station 1 mooring deployment |
PD07_05 | 2005-03-03 to 2005-03-04 | 23 hour CTD station Mooring recovery | 19 hour CTD station Mooring recovery |
PD05_06 | 2006-02-08 to 2006-02-10 | 24 hour CTD station 2 x mooring deployment | 22 hour CTD station 1 mooring deployment |
PD09_06 | 2006-03-06 to 2006-03-09 | 23 hour CTD station Mooring recovery | 25 hour CTD station Mooring recovery |
PD04_07 | 2007-03-13 to 2007-03-16 | 25 hour CTD station 2 x mooring deployment | 25 hour CTD station 1 mooring deployment |
Funding
The Dee Experiment project was core funded by POL under Programme 2 (Shallow coastal seas) Theme 5 (Coastal and sediment processes) of POL's Science Programme 2001 - 2006. From March 2007 onwards, this core funding was replaced by funding from NERC's Oceans 2025 programme and the Dee Experiment research continued as part of Oceans 2025 Work Package 3.3.
Data Activity or Cruise Information
Data Activity
Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 2007-03-15 |
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | 2009-08-17 |
Organization Undertaking Activity | Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (now National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool) |
Country of Organization | United Kingdom |
Originator's Data Activity Identifier | 263 |
Platform Category | fixed benthic node |
Dee Estuary Experiment Stable3
Principal Scientific Officer | Alejandro Souza |
---|---|
Organisation | Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory (POL) |
Deployment Information
Deployment Cruise | Date |
---|---|
RV Prince Madog 04_07 | 15 March 2007 |
Recovery Information
Recovery Cruise | Date |
---|---|
RV Prince Madog 06_07 | 17 April 2007 |
The following table gives the position of frame Stable3.
Frame ID | Latitude (North) | Longitude (East) |
---|---|---|
Stable3 | 53.42528 | -3.34194 |
The frame's instrumentation is detailed in the below table:
Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter G365 + B281 |
Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter G355 + B285 |
Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter G358 + B292 |
POL ABS1 |
SyncGen1 |
Marine Electronics 3-D ripple profiler with external battery pack |
AML CT logger with three external CT probes on own cables and external battery pack |
Paros Digiquartz pressure sensor |
Two D and A Instruments OBS3+ model OBS sensors set for 500NTU measurement range. |
RDI ADCP on a gimbal mount |
Andera ADCP with external battery pack |
LISST100 |
The ADVs were mounted at separate heights on a vertical pole with the transmitter axis pointing horizontally, i.e. perpendicular to the sea surface/sea bed.
The frame was of a tripod design with the following overall dimensions (all measurements +/- 0.005 m):
Height : | 1.53 m |
Separation of legs (top) : | 1.52 m |
Separation of legs (bottom) : | 2.16 m |
Front to back : | 1.30 m |
Height to centre of lowest cross-member : | 1.10 m |
Cruise
Cruise Name | PD04/07 |
Departure Date | 2007-03-13 |
Arrival Date | 2007-03-16 |
Principal Scientist(s) | Alejandro J Souza (Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory) |
Ship | RV Prince Madog |
Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here
Fixed Station Information
No Fixed Station Information held for the Series
BODC Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
Blank | Unqualified |
< | Below detection limit |
> | In excess of quoted value |
A | Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.) |
B | Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast |
C | Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.) |
D | Thermometric depth |
E | End of CTD Down/Up Cast |
G | Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty |
H | Extrapolated value |
I | Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.) |
K | Improbable value - unknown quality control source |
L | Improbable value - originator's quality control |
M | Improbable value - BODC quality control |
N | Null value |
O | Improbable value - user quality control |
P | Trace/calm |
Q | Indeterminate |
R | Replacement value |
S | Estimated value |
T | Interpolated value |
U | Uncalibrated |
W | Control value |
X | Excessive difference |
SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags
The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:
Flag | Description |
---|---|
0 | no quality control |
1 | good value |
2 | probably good value |
3 | probably bad value |
4 | bad value |
5 | changed value |
6 | value below detection |
7 | value in excess |
8 | interpolated value |
9 | missing value |
A | value phenomenon uncertain |
B | nominal value |
Q | value below limit of quantification |