Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 2096179


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
General Oceanics GO-FLO water sampler  discrete water samplers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator Prof Geoff Millward
Originating Organization Polytechnic South West Institute of Marine Studies (now University of Plymouth, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences)
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) North Sea Project 1987-1992
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier CH51_CTD_TMXX_27:1787
BODC Series Reference 2096179
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1989-04-30 20:20
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 53.50127 N ( 53° 30.1' N )
Longitude 2.99866 E ( 2° 59.9' E )
Positional Uncertainty 0.05 to 0.1 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 10.0 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 10.0 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 21.2 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 21.2 m
Sea Floor Depth 31.2 m
Sea Floor Depth Source PEVENT
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Unspecified -
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
COCNAAP21Milligrams per kilogramConcentration of cobalt {Co CAS 7440-48-4} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
COXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of cobalt {Co CAS 7440-48-4} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
CUCNAAP21Milligrams per kilogramConcentration of copper {Cu CAS 7440-50-8} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
CUXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of copper {Cu CAS 7440-50-8} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
FECNAAP21PercentConcentration of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
FEXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of total iron {total_Fe CAS 7439-89-6} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
MNCNAAP21PercentConcentration of total manganese {total_Mn CAS 7439-96-5} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
MNXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of total manganese {total_Mn CAS 7439-96-5} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
NICNAAP21Milligrams per kilogramConcentration of nickel {Ni CAS 7440-02-0} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
NIXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of nickel {Ni CAS 7440-02-0} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
PBCNAAP21Milligrams per kilogramConcentration of lead {Pb CAS 7439-92-1} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
PBXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of lead {Pb CAS 7439-92-1} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number
ZNCNAAP21Milligrams per kilogramConcentration of zinc {Zn CAS 7440-66-6} per unit dry weight of suspended particulate material >0.4/0.45um by filtration and atomic absorption spectroscopy
ZNXXAAP21Nanomoles per litreConcentration of zinc {Zn CAS 7440-66-6} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >0.4/0.45um phase] by acid leaching of filter residue and atomic absorption spectroscopy

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."


Narrative Documents

GO-FLO Bottle

A water sampling bottle featuring close-open-close operation. The bottle opens automatically at approximately 10 metres and flushes until closed. Sampling with these bottles avoids contamination at the surface, internal spring contamination, loss of sample on deck and exchange of water from different depths.

There are several sizes available, from 1.7 to 100 litres and are made of PVC with a depth rating of up to 500 m. These bottles can be attached to a rosette or placed on a cable at selected positions.

Particulate Trace Metals as part of the North Sea Project

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation

Sampling strategy and methodology

Samples for trace metal analysis were collected, using clean techniques, by 10 litre Teflon-lined Go-Flo bottles (modified to reduce the contamination potential for trace metals) fitted to the CTD rosette sampler. Initial sample handling was carried out on board using the facilities of the RVS clean chemistry container (Morley et al., 1988).

Each sea water sample was pressure-filtered (ca. 0.7 bar) in-line through a 0.4 um Nuclepore membrane filter. For a substantial proportion of the samples large volume filtration systems were used to obtain sufficient suspended particulate material for trace metal analysis. Membranes were stored frozen until analysis.

The filtrates were used for dissolved trace metal determinations using compatible analytical procedures. This greatly enhances the value of the data set.

Suspended matter concentrations were determined on the same sample as the chemical analysis.

Analytical techniques

The samples were leached using 1M HCl at room temperature for 8 hours under clean conditions. The leachate was decanted into volumetric flasks and made up to volume. Metals were determined by either flame AAS or GFAAS.

Unit Conversions

The data for cruises CH33, CH42, CH43, CH46, CH50, CH51 and CH61 were supplied to BODC in units of ug/g dry weight or per cent in the case of aluminium. The metals supplied in ug/g were converted to nanomoles per litre of water by multiplying by the suspended matter concentration (included with the data) and dividing by the atomic weight (Cd 112.4; Co 58.933; Cr 51.996; Cu 63.54; Fe 55.847; Mn 54.938; Ni 58.69; Pb 207.19; Zn 65.37).

Aluminium was converted to micromoles per litre of water by multiplying by 10 times the suspended matter concentration and dividing by the atomic weight (26.982).

Data for CH44, CH52, CH60 and CH72C were supplied in molar form but also include the suspended matter concentration and therefore the metal concentrations in the particulate phase may be calculated if required.

References

Morley, N.H., P.J. Statham and C. Fay (1988) Design and use of a clean shipboard handling system for sea water samples. In: Advances in Underwater Technology, Ocean Science and Offshore Engineering, Volume 16 (Oceanology '88), Graham and Trotman, London, 283-290.


Project Information

North Sea Project

The North Sea Project (NSP) was the first Marine Sciences Community Research project of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). It evolved from a NERC review of shelf sea research, which identified the need for a concerted multidisciplinary study of circulation, transport and production.

The ultimate aim of the NERC North Sea Project was the development of a suite of prognostic water quality models to aid management of the North Sea. To progress towards water quality models, three intermediate objectives were pursued in parallel:

  • Production of a 3-D transport model for any conservative passive constituent, incorporating improved representations of the necessary physics - hydrodynamics and dispersion;
  • Identifying and quantifying non-conservative processes - sources and sinks determining the cycling and fate of individual constituents;
  • Defining a complete seasonal cycle as a database for all the observational studies needed to formulate, drive and test models.

Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory hosted the project, which involved over 200 scientists and support staff from NERC and other Government funded laboratories, as well as seven universities and polytechnics.

The project ran from 1987 to 1992, with marine field data collection between April 1988 and October 1989. One shakedown (CH28) and fifteen survey cruises (Table 1), each lasting 12 days and following the same track, were repeated monthly. The track selected covered the summer-stratified waters of the north and the homogeneous waters in the Southern Bight in about equal lengths together with their separating frontal band from Flamborough head to Dogger Bank, the Friesian Islands and the German Bight. Mooring stations were maintained at six sites for the duration of the project.

Table 1: Details of NSP Survey Cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date
CH28 29/04/88 - 15/05/88
CH33 04/08/88 - 16/08/88
CH35 03/09/88 - 15/09/88
CH37 02/10/88 - 14/10/88
CH39 01/11/88 - 13/11/88
CH41 01/12/88 - 13/12/88
CH43 30/12/88 - 12/01/89
CH45 28/01/89 - 10/02/89
CH47 27/02/89 - 12/03/89
CH49 29/03/89 - 10/04/89
CH51 27/04/89 - 09/05/89
CH53 26/05/89 - 07/06/89
CH55 24/06/89 - 07/07/89
CH57 24/07/89 - 06/08/89
CH59 23/08/89 - 04/09/89
CH61 21/09/89 - 03/10/89

Alternating with the survey cruises were process study cruises (Table 2), which investigated some particular aspect of the science of the North Sea. These included fronts (nearshore, circulation and mixing), sandwaves and sandbanks, plumes (Humber, Wash, Thames and Rhine), resuspension, air-sea exchange, primary productivity and blooms/chemistry.

Table 2: Details of NSP Process cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date Process
CH34 18/08/88 - 01/09/88 Fronts - nearshore
CH36 16/09/88 - 30/09/88 Fronts - mixing
CH56 08/07/89 - 22/07/89 Fronts - circulation
CH58 07/08/89 - 21/08/89 Fronts - mixing
CH38 24/10/88 - 31/10/88 Sandwaves
CH40 15/11/88 - 29/11/88 Sandbanks
CH42 15/12/88 - 29/12/88 Plumes/Sandbanks
CH46 12/02/89 - 26/02/89 Plumes/Sandwaves
CH44 13/01/89 - 27/01/89 Resuspension
CH52 11/05/89 - 24/05/89 Resuspension
CH60 06/09/89 - 19/09/89 Resuspension
CH48 13/03/89 - 27/03/89 Air/sea exchanges
CH62 05/10/89 - 19/10/89 Air/sea exchanges
CH50 12/04/89 - 25/04/89 Blooms/chemistry
CH54 09/06/89 - 22/06/89 Production

In addition to the main data collection period, a series of cruises took place between October 1989 and October 1990 that followed up work done on previous cruises (Table 3). Process studies relating to blooms, plumes (Humber, Wash and Rhine), sandwaves and the flux of contaminants through the Dover Strait were carried out as well as two `survey' cruises.

Table 3: Details of NSP `Follow up' cruises on RRS Challenger
Cruise No. Date Process
CH62A 23/10/89 - 03/11/89 Blooms
CH64 03/04/90 - 03/05/90 Blooms
CH65 06/05/90 - 17/05/90 Humber plume
CH66A 20/05/90 - 31/05/90 Survey
CH66B 03/06/90 - 18/06/90 Contaminants through Dover Strait
CH69 26/07/90 - 07/08/90 Resuspension/Plumes
CH72A 20/09/90 - 02/10/90 Survey
CH72B 04/10/90 - 06/10/90 Sandwaves/STABLE
CH72C 06/10/90 - 19/10/90 Rhine plume

The data collected during the observational phase of the North Sea Project comprised one of the most detailed sets of observations ever undertaken in any shallow shelf sea at that time.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1989-04-30
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1989-04-30
Organization Undertaking ActivityPlymouth Marine Laboratory
Country of OrganizationUnited Kingdom
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierCH51_CTD_1787
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for CH51_CTD_1787

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
285872   10.00       28.90   29.20   25.90 Niskin bottle No problem reported    
285886   10.00       12.80   13.20   10.00 General Oceanics GO-FLO water sampler No problem reported    
285902   10.00        3.90    4.80    1.40 Niskin bottle No problem reported    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1

Cruise

Cruise Name CH51
Departure Date 1989-04-27
Arrival Date 1989-05-09
Principal Scientist(s)Alan W Morris (Plymouth Marine Laboratory)
Ship RRS Challenger

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information

Fixed Station Information

Station NameNSP Survey D and CTD Site BB
CategoryOffshore location
Latitude53° 30.00' N
Longitude3° 0.00' E
Water depth below MSL30.0 m

North Sea Project Survey Mooring Site D and CTD Site BB

Site D was one of six fixed stations where moorings were deployed during the North Sea Project Survey. This location is also one of 123 North Sea Project CTD Sites.

The site was characterised by moderate tidal currents, up to a maximum of 1.0 m/s.

The rigs deployed here lie within a box bounded by 53.488N 2.988E at the southwest corner and 53.503N 3.012E at the northeast corner. Magnetic variation at this site was 3.7° west.

Site D deployment history is summarised below:

Rig ID Meter type Meter height Start date Data return (days) Comment
C33DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

07/08/88

07/08/88

0.0

29.8

Data corrupt

N/A

C33DT THCH   07/08/88 30 Data 'noisy' from 29 August 1988
C35DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

06/09/88

06/09/88

25.2

28.7

 
C35DT THCH   06/09/88 29 Data for 5.0m thermistor bead only
C37DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

05/10/88

05/10/88

0.0

65.6

Rig trawled, ADCP lost

Rig trawled, CM recovered

C39DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

04/11/88

04/11/88

37.3

37.9

 
C41DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

12/12/88

12/12/88

11.6

43.6

 
C45DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

31/01/89

31/01/89

32.3

32.6

 
C47DC ADCP 0.8m 04/03/89 17.8  
C49DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

01/04/89

01/04/89

28.6

28.9

 
C49DT THCH   01/04/89 29 Data for 5.0m thermistor bead only
C51DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

30/04/89

30/04/89

26.7

28.8

 
C51DT THCH   30/04/89 29 Data for 5.0m thermistor bead only
C53DC ADCP 0.8m 29/04/89 28.7  
C53DT THCH   29/05/89 30 Good data
C55DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

27/06/89

27/06/89

12.8

30.1

 
C55DT THCH   27/06/89 31 Good data
C57DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

27/07/89

27/07/89

29.7

29.7

 
C57DT THCH   27/07/89 30 Good data
C59DC

ADCP

CM

0.8m

0.8m

26/08/89

26/08/89

28.8

28.8

 
C59DT THCH   26/08/89 28 Good data
C66DC CM 0.8m 24/05/90 23.0  

ADCP = Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
CM = Current Meter (Aanderaa or S4)
THCH = Thermistor Chain

Related Fixed Station activities are detailed in Appendix 2


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: CH51_CTD_1787

Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
1244598Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0053.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
1705600Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0053.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
1860833Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0053.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2082123Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2083279Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2096886Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51

Appendix 2: NSP Survey D and CTD Site BB

Related series for this Fixed Station are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
781088CTD or STD cast1988-05-01 17:33:0052.65333 N, 3.553 ERRS Challenger CH28
782123CTD or STD cast1988-05-04 19:53:0055.5 N, 6.7035 ERRS Challenger CH28
769201CTD or STD cast1988-08-07 17:49:0053.49683 N, 3.00867 ERRS Challenger CH33
580199Hydrography time series at depth1988-08-07 18:20:0153.5 N, 3.0 ENot applicable
605047Hydrography time series at depth1988-08-07 18:50:3853.4943 N, 2.999 ENot applicable
783280CTD or STD cast1988-09-06 13:25:0053.50217 N, 2.999 ERRS Challenger CH35
580292Hydrography time series at depth1988-09-06 15:30:0053.5 N, 2.995 ENot applicable
605096Hydrography time series at depth1988-09-06 15:31:5253.5002 N, 2.998 ENot applicable
604241Currents -subsurface Eulerian1988-09-07 05:19:1753.5 N, 2.995 ENot applicable
784511CTD or STD cast1988-10-05 04:53:0053.4945 N, 3.00433 ERRS Challenger CH37
580255Hydrography time series at depth1988-10-05 09:19:5953.4978 N, 2.9965 ENot applicable
821535CTD or STD cast1988-11-04 11:11:0053.50033 N, 3.00033 ERRS Challenger CH39
580243Hydrography time series at depth1988-11-04 15:29:5953.4968 N, 2.9987 ENot applicable
604228Currents -subsurface Eulerian1988-11-04 15:39:2653.4968 N, 2.9987 ENot applicable
785587CTD or STD cast1988-12-12 14:35:0053.52067 N, 2.98117 ERRS Challenger CH41
580218Hydrography time series at depth1988-12-12 16:50:0053.4968 N, 2.9993 ENot applicable
604161Currents -subsurface Eulerian1988-12-12 16:59:2553.4968 N, 2.9993 ENot applicable
786308CTD or STD cast1989-01-04 09:35:0053.47967 N, 3.00983 ERRS Challenger CH43
791292CTD or STD cast1989-01-31 17:44:0053.51017 N, 2.98983 ERRS Challenger CH45
1859659Water sample data1989-01-31 17:46:0053.51016 N, 2.98991 ERRS Challenger CH45
580231Hydrography time series at depth1989-01-31 19:09:5953.4965 N, 3.0 ENot applicable
604173Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-01-31 19:19:2953.4965 N, 3.0 ENot applicable
792535CTD or STD cast1989-03-02 12:02:0053.4975 N, 3.01067 ERRS Challenger CH47
1857388Water sample data1989-03-02 12:04:0053.4975 N, 3.01059 ERRS Challenger CH47
604204Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-03-04 17:09:1753.4935 N, 3.0013 ENot applicable
794032CTD or STD cast1989-04-01 14:06:0053.514 N, 2.9925 ERRS Challenger CH49
1858712Water sample data1989-04-01 14:09:0053.51399 N, 2.99249 ERRS Challenger CH49
794044CTD or STD cast1989-04-01 17:01:0053.49633 N, 2.999 ERRS Challenger CH49
1858724Water sample data1989-04-01 17:04:0053.49638 N, 2.99908 ERRS Challenger CH49
605035Hydrography time series at depth1989-04-01 18:11:1753.4993 N, 2.9928 ENot applicable
580187Hydrography time series at depth1989-04-01 20:30:0053.489 N, 3.0 ENot applicable
604136Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-04-01 20:39:2053.489 N, 3.0 ENot applicable
604216Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-04-30 18:39:2853.4885 N, 2.9882 ENot applicable
591831Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-04-30 18:40:0053.4885 N, 2.9882 ENot applicable
605084Hydrography time series at depth1989-04-30 20:03:4753.4985 N, 2.9933 ENot applicable
794972CTD or STD cast1989-04-30 20:15:0053.50133 N, 2.99867 ERRS Challenger CH51
1860833Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0053.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2082123Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2083279Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
2096886Water sample data1989-04-30 20:20:0653.50127 N, 2.99866 ERRS Challenger CH51
796284CTD or STD cast1989-05-29 12:27:0053.5005 N, 3.00133 ERRS Challenger CH53
1863321Water sample data1989-05-29 12:30:0053.50049 N, 3.00138 ERRS Challenger CH53
605072Hydrography time series at depth1989-05-29 16:16:1553.5017 N, 3.01 ENot applicable
604197Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-05-29 16:29:2753.5002 N, 3.0053 ENot applicable
604185Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-06-27 09:55:0053.5028 N, 3.0043 ENot applicable
605060Hydrography time series at depth1989-06-27 09:55:0053.4988 N, 3.0078 ENot applicable
591806Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-06-27 10:00:0053.5028 N, 3.0043 ENot applicable
798647CTD or STD cast1989-06-27 10:03:0053.4985 N, 3.015 ERRS Challenger CH55
798961CTD or STD cast1989-07-27 14:50:0053.49783 N, 3.00067 ERRS Challenger CH57
1245817Water sample data1989-07-27 14:53:0053.49785 N, 3.0006 ERRS Challenger CH57
1709281Water sample data1989-07-27 14:53:0053.49785 N, 3.0006 ERRS Challenger CH57
1864613Water sample data1989-07-27 14:53:0053.49785 N, 3.0006 ERRS Challenger CH57
605059Hydrography time series at depth1989-07-27 15:46:5253.4932 N, 3.0055 ENot applicable
604148Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-07-27 15:49:1853.4972 N, 3.0117 ENot applicable
580206Hydrography time series at depth1989-07-27 15:50:0053.4972 N, 3.0117 ENot applicable
801466CTD or STD cast1989-08-26 09:13:0053.4925 N, 3.00733 ERRS Challenger CH59
1856164Water sample data1989-08-26 09:16:0053.49245 N, 3.0073 ERRS Challenger CH59
605103Hydrography time series at depth1989-08-26 10:03:4553.495 N, 3.01 ENot applicable
604253Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-08-26 10:19:2453.495 N, 3.01 ENot applicable
591843Currents -subsurface Eulerian1989-08-26 10:20:0053.495 N, 3.01 ENot applicable
800149CTD or STD cast1989-09-24 05:09:0053.499 N, 2.99967 ERRS Challenger CH61
2087404Water sample data1989-09-24 05:14:5353.49908 N, 2.99972 ERRS Challenger CH61
1854919Water sample data1989-09-24 05:15:0053.49908 N, 2.99972 ERRS Challenger CH61
802758CTD or STD cast1990-05-23 22:19:0053.50033 N, 2.99433 ERRS Challenger CH66A
591818Currents -subsurface Eulerian1990-05-24 06:30:0053.4982 N, 3.0058 ENot applicable
802802CTD or STD cast1990-05-24 06:42:0053.50433 N, 3.0045 ERRS Challenger CH66A
827893CTD or STD cast1990-06-16 14:47:0053.49633 N, 3.01183 ERRS Challenger CH66B
804789CTD or STD cast1990-09-26 03:55:0053.49817 N, 2.99583 ERRS Challenger CH72A
829537CTD or STD cast1990-10-14 06:45:0053.49683 N, 3.00233 ERRS Challenger CH72C