Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 859895

Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category CTD or STD cast
Instrument Type
Neil Brown MK3 CTD  CTD; water temperature sensor; salinity sensor; dissolved gas sensors
SeaTech transmissometer  transmissometers
Chelsea Technologies Group Aquatracka fluorometer  fluorometers
Chelsea Technologies Group 2-pi PAR irradiance sensor  radiometers
Instrument Mounting research vessel
Originating Country United Kingdom
Originator Prof Paul Tett
Originating Organization Napier University School of Life Sciences (now Edinburgh Napier University School of Life, Sport & Social Sciences)
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS)

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier CP115
BODC Series Reference 859895

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1996-05-04 08:06
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval 2.0 decibars

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 56.60817 N ( 56° 36.5' N )
Longitude 9.28900 W ( 9° 17.3' W )
Positional Uncertainty 0.0 to 0.01 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 2.97 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 991.43 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 18.07 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 1006.53 m
Sea Floor Depth 1009.5 m
Sea Floor Depth Source DATAHEAD
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Variable common depth - All sensors are grouped effectively at the same depth, but this depth varies significantly during the series
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface
Sea Floor Depth Datum Instantaneous - Depth measured below water line or instantaneous water body surface


BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ATTNZR011per metreAttenuation (red light wavelength) per unit length of the water body by transmissometer
CPHLPR011Milligrams per cubic metreConcentration of chlorophyll-a {chl-a CAS 479-61-8} per unit volume of the water body [particulate >unknown phase] by in-situ chlorophyll fluorometer
DOXYPR011Micromoles per litreConcentration of oxygen {O2 CAS 7782-44-7} per unit volume of the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by in-situ Beckmann probe
IRRDPP011MicroEinsteins per square metre per secondDownwelling 2-pi scalar irradiance as photons of electromagnetic radiation (PAR wavelengths) in the water body by 2-pi scalar radiometer
IRRUPP011MicroEinsteins per square metre per secondUpwelling 2-pi scalar irradiance as photons of electromagnetic radiation (PAR wavelengths) in the water body by 2-pi scalar radiometer
OXYSBB011PercentSaturation of oxygen {O2 CAS 7782-44-7} in the water body [dissolved plus reactive particulate phase] by in-situ Beckmann probe and computation from concentration using Benson and Krause algorithm
POATCV011per metrePotential attenuance (unspecified wavelength) per unit length of the water body by transmissometer and computation using P-EXEC algorithm
POTMCV011Degrees CelsiusPotential temperature of the water body by computation using UNESCO 1983 algorithm
PRESPR011DecibarsPressure (spatial coordinate) exerted by the water body by profiling pressure sensor and correction to read zero at sea level
PSALST011DimensionlessPractical salinity of the water body by CTD and computation using UNESCO 1983 algorithm
SIGTPR011Kilograms per cubic metreSigma-theta of the water body by CTD and computation from salinity and potential temperature using UNESCO algorithm
TEMPST011Degrees CelsiusTemperature of the water body by CTD or STD

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database

Data Access Policy

Open Data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

You must always use the following attribution statement to acknowledge the source of the information: "Contains data supplied by Natural Environment Research Council."

Narrative Documents

Neil Brown MK3 CTD

The Neil Brown MK3 conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) profiler consists of an integral unit containing pressure, temperature and conductivity sensors with an optional dissolved oxygen sensor in a pressure-hardened casing. The most widely used variant in the 1980s and 1990s was the MK3B. An upgrade to this, the MK3C, was developed to meet the requirements of the WOCE project.

The MK3C includes a low hysteresis, titanium strain gauge pressure transducer. The transducer temperature is measured separately, allowing correction for the effects of temperature on pressure measurements. The MK3C conductivity cell features a free flow, internal field design that eliminates ducted pumping and is not affected by external metallic objects such as guard cages and external sensors.

Additional optional sensors include pH and a pressure-temperature fluorometer. The instrument is no longer in production, but is supported (repair and calibration) by General Oceanics.


These specification apply to the MK3C version.

Pressure Temperature Conductivity

6500 m

3200 m (optional)

-3 to 32°C 1 to 6.5 S cm-1

0.0015% FS

0.03% FS < 1 msec


0.003°C < 30 msec

0.0001 S cm-1

0.0003 S cm-1 < 30 msec

Further details can be found in the specification sheet.

Aquatracka fluorometer

The Chelsea Instruments Aquatracka is a logarithmic response fluorometer. It uses a pulsed (5.5 Hz) xenon light source discharging between 320 and 800 nm through a blue filter with a peak transmission of 420 nm and a bandwidth at half maximum of 100 nm. A red filter with sharp cut off, 10% transmission at 664 nm and 678 nm, is used to pass chlorophyll-a fluorescence to the sample photodiode.

The instrument may be deployed either in a through-flow tank, on a CTD frame or moored with a data logging package.

Further details can be found in the manufacturer's specification sheet.

Chelsea Technologies Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) Irradiance Sensor

This sensor was originally designed to assist the study of marine photosynthesis. With the use of logarithmic amplication, the sensor covers a range of 6 orders of magnitude, which avoids setting up the sensor range for the expected signal level for different ambient conditions.

The sensor consists of a hollow PTFE 2-pi collector supported by a clear acetal dome diverting light to a filter and photodiode from which a cosine response is obtained. The sensor can be used in moorings, profiling or deployed in towed vehicles and can measure both upwelling and downwelling light.


Operation depth 1000 m
Range 2000 to 0.002 µE m-2 s-1
Angular Detection Range ± 130° from normal incidence
Relative Spectral Sensitivity

flat to ± 3% from 450 to 700 nm

down 8% of 400 nm and 36% at 350 nm

Further details can be found in the manufacturer's specification sheet.

SeaTech Transmissometer


The transmissometer is designed to accurately measure the the amount of light transmitted by a modulated Light Emitting Diode (LED) through a fixed-length in-situ water column to a synchronous detector.


  • Water path length: 5 cm (for use in turbid waters) to 1 m (for use in clear ocean waters).
  • Beam diameter: 15 mm
  • Transmitted beam collimation: <3 milliradians
  • Receiver acceptance angle (in water): <18 milliradians
  • Light source wavelength: usually (but not exclusively) 660 nm (red light)


The instrument can be interfaced to Aanderaa RCM7 current meters. This is achieved by fitting the transmissometer in a slot cut into a customized RCM4-type vane.

A red LED (660 nm) is used for general applications looking at water column sediment load. However, green or blue LEDs can be fitted for specilised optics applications. The light source used is identified by the BODC parameter code.

Further details can be found in the manufacturer's Manual.

RRS Challenger 126B CTD Data Documentation

Components of the CTD data set

The CTD data set for cruise CH126B consists of 157 vertical profiles containing the parameters temperature, salinity, upwelling and downwelling irradiance, chlorophyll, dissolved oxygen and optical attenuance.

Data Acquisition and On-Board Processing


The CTD profiles were taken with an RVS Neil Brown Mk3B CTD incorporating a pressure sensor, conductivity cell, platinum resistance thermometer and a Beckmann dissolved oxygen sensor. Water was pumped over the oxygen membrane using a SeaBird pump. The CTD unit was mounted vertically in the centre of a protective cage approximately 1.5m square. Attached to the bars of the frame were a Chelsea Instruments Aquatracka fluorometer and a SeaTech red light (661 nm) transmissometer with a 25cm path length.

Above the frame was a General Oceanics rosette sampler fitted with twelve 10-litre Niskin water bottles. The bases of the bottles were 0.75 metres above the pressure head and their tops 1.55 metres above it. One bottle was fitted with a holder for twin digital reversing thermometers mounted 1.38 metres above the CTD temperature sensor.

Above the rosette was a PML 2pi PAR (photosynthetically available radiation) sensor pointing upwards to measure downwelling irradiance. A second 2pi PAR sensor, pointing downwards, was fitted to the bottom of the cage to measure upwelling irradiance. It should be noted that these sensors were vertically separated by 2 metres with the upwelling sensor 0.2 metres below the pressure head and the downwelling sensor 1.75 metres above it.

No account has been taken of rig geometry in the compilation of the CTD data set. However, all water bottle sampling depths have been corrected for rig geometry and represent the true position of the midpoint of the water bottle in the water column.

Data Acquisition

On each cast, the CTD was lowered continuously at 0.5 to 1.0 m s-1 to the closest comfortable proximity to the sea floor. The upcast was done in stages between the bottle firing depths.

Data were logged by the RVS ABC data logging system. Output channels from the deck unit were logged at 32 Hz by a microprocessor interface (the Level A) which passed time-stamped averaged cycles at 1 Hz to a Sun workstation (the Level C) via a buffering system (the Level B).

On-Board Data Processing

The raw data comprised ADC counts. These were converted into engineering units (volts for PAR meters, fluorometer and transmissometer; ml l-1 for oxygen; mmho cm-1 for conductivity; °C for temperature; decibars for pressure) by the application of laboratory determined calibrations. Salinity (Practical Salinity Units as defined in Fofonoff and Millard, 1983) was calculated from the conductivity ratios (conductivity/42.914) and a time lagged temperature using the function described in UNESCO Report 37 (1981).

The dataset was submitted to BODC in this form on Quarter Inch Cartridge tapes in RVS internal format for post-cruise processing and data banking.

Post-Cruise Processing and Calibration at BODC


The data were converted into the BODC internal format (PXF) to allow the use of in-house software tools, notably the workstation graphics editor. In addition to reformatting, the transfer program applied the following modifications to the data:

  • Dissolved oxygen (nominal calibration applied) was converted from ml l-1 to µM by multiplying the values by 44.66.
  • Transmissometer voltages were corrected to the manufacturer's specified voltage by ratio using transmissometer air readings taken during the cruise.
  • Transmissometer voltages were converted to percentage transmission by multiplying them by a factor of 20.
  • The transmissometer data were converted to attenuance using the algorithm:-
attenuance (m-1) = -4 loge (% transmission/100)


Reformatted CTD data were transferred onto a high speed graphics workstation. Using custom in-house graphics editors, downcasts and upcasts were differentiated and the limits of the downcasts and upcasts were manually flagged.

Spikes on all the downcast channels were manually flagged. No data values were edited or deleted; flagging was achieved by modification of the associated quality control flag.

The pressure ranges over which the bottle samples had been collected were logged by manual interaction with the software. Usually, the marked reaction of the oxygen sensor to the bottle firing sequence was used to determine this. These pressure ranges were subsequently used, in conjunction with a geometrical correction for the position of the water bottles with respect to the CTD pressure transducer, to determine the pressure range of data to be averaged for calibration values.

Once screened on the workstation, the CTD downcasts were loaded into a database under the ORACLE Relational DataBase Management System.

For this cruise, the RVS Neil Brown Mk 3B CTD system was equipped with a SeaBird pump, which sent water at a constant rate through the housing containing the existing Beckman oxygen electrode. Problems associated with the plumbing of the pump to the oxygen probe resulted in many profiles only recording good oxygen data on upcasts. To overcome this, the upcast data for oxygen, temperature and salinity channels were flagged to remove any spikes. The downcast oxygen values loaded into ORACLE were then replaced where necessary by upcast oxygen data using isopycnal (rather than pressure) matching to determine the replacement values to be used.


With the exception of pressure, calibrations were done by comparison of CTD data against measurements made on water bottle samples or from the reversing thermometers mounted on the water bottles as in the case of temperature. In general, values were averaged from the CTD downcasts but where visual inspection of the data showed significant hysteresis values were manually extracted from the CTD upcasts.

All calibrations described here have been applied to the data.


The pressure offset was determined by looking at the pressures recorded when the CTD was clearly logging in air (readily apparent from the conductivity channel). A consistent air reading was exhibited and the following correction applied:

Pcorr = P - 3.06 (standard deviation 0.22 dbar)

The CTD temperature was compared with the calibrated digital reversing thermometers attached to the instrument frame. There were six suspect comparisons in a data set of 132 CTD temperature readings. Ignoring the suspect data the two instruments were found to agree within 0.003 °C. Hence, no temperature correction was applied to the CTD data.


During graphical examination of the data, a number of salinity offsets were observed that clearly affected the density profiles. These have been attributed to conductivity cell fouling and have been eliminated by the application of the following corrections:

CP97  0.0075 PSU added between 18 db and 57.5 db
CP101  0.005 PSU added between 63 db and 87 db
CP103  0.005 PSU added between 37 db and 56.1 db
CP134  0.010 PSU added between 188 db and 199 db
CP134  0.025 PSU added between 204 db and 221 db
CP143  0.010 PSU added between 84 db and 96.5 db
CP149  0.010 PSU added between 76 db and 106 db
CP157  0.010 PSU added between 24 db and 41.1 db
CP157  0.005 PSU added between 41.2 db and 56 db
CP159  0.027 PSU added between 0 db and 120 db

Salinity was then calibrated against water bottle samples measured on the Guildline 55358 AutoLab Salinometer during the cruise.

Samples were collected in glass bottles filled to just below the neck and sealed with plastic stoppers. Batches of samples were left for at least 24 hours to reach thermal equilibrium in the lab containing the salinometer before analysis.

The correction applied for this cruise was:

Scorr = S + 0.034 (standard deviation 0.004)
Upwelling and Downwelling Irradiance

The PAR voltages were converted to W m-2 using the following equations determined in August 1995 supplied by RVS.

  Upwelling (#2): PAR (W m-2) = exp (-4.97*volts + 6.878)/100
Casts CP46 to CP135:  
  Downwelling (#1): PAR (W m-2) = exp (-4.90*volts + 7.237)/100
Casts CP136 to CP202:
  Downwelling (#8): PAR (W m-2) = exp (-4.97*volts + 6.426)/100

Note that these sensors have been empirically calibrated to obtain a conversion from W/m2 into µE/m2/s, which may be effected by multiplying the data given by 3.75.

Optical Attenuance and Suspended Particulate Matter

Two different transmissometers were used during cruise CH126B. For casts CP46 to CP72 the instrument used (SN103D) had a manufacturer's voltage of 4.758V. The air correction applied for these casts was obtained from an air reading during cruise Challenger CH125B (4.622V). The Challenger CH125B value was used as no air readings were taken during this part of the cruise.

For casts CP73 to CP202 the instrument used (SN125D) had a manufacturer's voltage of 4.789V. The air correction applied for this instrument was based on an air reading obtained during this section of the cruise (4.690V).

Reports were received from UWB that the clear water attenuance values measured by SN103D were anomalously high. A careful investigation was initiated to look at this problem. This involved examination of clear water attenuance values from casts deeper than 500 m and an inter-comparison of the surface attenuance values with contemporaneous data from the underway transmissometer. It must be stressed that this exercise was comparative, looking at differences in the relationship between the CTD and underway instruments. No attempt was made to render both data sets numerically identical as experience has shown that the mechanical effects of the pump on the suspended particulate material modify the attenuance of water in the non-toxic supply.

Further information on the pattern of corrections required was obtained by examination of the superimposed attenuance profiles from groups of series on a graphics editor.

As a result, the following corrections were derived and have been applied to the data:

Attencorr = Atten -0.19 (SD = 0.02)  Casts CP46 to CP52 only
Attencorr = Atten -0.10 (SD = 0.03)  Casts CP53 to CP72 only

These corrections produce a minimum attenuance value of 0.34, which is lower than expected for deep water in the SES field area. The attenuance data for casts CP46 to CP72 should therefore be used with a degree of caution.

Large volume samples were taken for gravimetric analysis of the suspended particulate matter concentration. These were used to generate calibrations that expressed attenuance in terms of suspended particulate matter concentrations.

Robin McCandliss (University of Wales, Bangor) undertook this work, under the supervision of Sarah Jones. The optimal approach developed was to base the calibration on samples taken from near the seabed (i.e. those with the minimum content of fluorescent material). The data from all SES cruises where SPM samples were taken were pooled to derive the calibration equation:

SPM (mg/l) = (2.368*Atten) - 0.801 (R2 = 79%)

This calibration is valid for all SES cruises after and including cruise Charles Darwin CD93A. The clear water attenuance predicted by the equation is 0.336 per m, which agrees well with literature values.

No attempt has been made to replace attenuance by SPM concentration in the final data set. However, users may use the equation above to compute an estimated SPM channel from attenuance when required.


200 ml of seawater collected at several depths on each cast were filtered and the papers frozen for acetone extraction and fluorometric analysis on land. There were 309 CTD chlorophyll values used in the calibration (range 0.08 to 6.23 mg m-3). The following relationship was found between extracted chlorophyll levels and corresponding fluorometer voltages:

Chlorophyll (mg/m3) = exp (0.85*volts - 2.22) (R2 = 69%, n =309)
Dissolved Oxygen

Dissolved oxygen concentrations were determined by micro-Winkler titration of seawater samples taken from a range of depths on several CTD casts. These values were compared with oxygen readings derived from the oxygen sensor membrane current, oxygen sensor temperature, sea temperature and salinity values recorded by the CTD on the upcast. Hilary Wilson (University of Wales, Bangor), under the supervision of Dr. Paul Tett, carried out this work. The following equation was supplied to BODC and the coefficients A and B were applied to the data:

[O2] = (A*C + B)* S' ml/l
where A = 2.3625023
  C = oxygen sensor current (µA)
  B = -0.0057156
  S'= oxygen saturation concentration (a function of water temperature and salinity).

Finally, the data were converted to µM by multiplication by 44.66.

The calibration coefficients used were derived using the pooled data from the profiles from which bottle oxygen samples were taken. Individual calibrations were derived for each of these profiles. These are included below for reference. However, please note that the whole cruise coefficients given above were applied to all profiles in the database.

CP51  2.11479085  0.05078459
CP69  2.31819552  -0.0174178
CP90  2.40072982  -0.041451
CP117  1.80121762  0.35455168
CP140  2.47991271  -0.0731599
CP150  2.49382778  -0.0637023
CP174  2.64767402  -0.1367603
CP183  2.52620942  -0.1129443
CP188  2.57519571  -0.1201767

Considerable manipulation of the oxygen data, such as the substitution of downcast data by isopycnal-matched upcast data, was required to produce the oxygen data channel in the final data set. This, combined with the uncertainties involved in the calibration of oxygen data, might mean that some users would wish to re-examine the oxygen processing. To facilitate this, BODC have systematically archived the raw data (including oxygen current and temperature) from both upcasts and downcasts. These data are available on request.

Data Reduction

Once all screening and calibration procedures were completed, the data set was binned to 2 db (casts deeper than 100 db) or 1 db (casts shallower than 100 db). The binning algorithm excluded any data points flagged suspect and attempted linear interpolation over gaps up to 3 bins wide. If any gaps larger than this were encountered, the data in the gaps were set null.

Oxygen saturation has been computed using the algorithm of Benson and Krause (1984).

Data Warnings

The transmissometer used for part of this cruise had an intermittent fault that caused variation in the signal baseline. Data from a number of the casts using this instrument have been rejected totally or for a significant proportion of the profile. An empirical calibration, based on intercalibration with the underway instrument, has been applied but resulted in a lower than expected clear water attenuance for the handful of deep casts taken before the transmissometer was swapped. Attenuance data from these casts (CP46-CP72) should be used with a degree of caution.


Benson B.B. and Krause D. jnr. 1984. The concentration and isotopic fractionation of oxygen dissolved in fresh water and sea water in equilibrium with the atmosphere. Limnol. Oceanogr. 29 pp.620-632.

Fofonoff N.P., and Millard Jr., R.C. 1982. Algorithms for Computation of Fundamental Properties of Seawater. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 44.

Project Information

Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS)


The Land Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS) was a Community Research Project of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). The broad aim of LOIS was to gain an understanding of, and an ability to predict, the nature of environmental change in the coastal zone around the UK through an integrated study from the river catchments through to the shelf break.

LOIS was a collaborative, multidisciplinary study undertaken by scientists from NERC research laboratories and Higher Education institutions. The LOIS project was managed from NERC's Plymouth Marine Laboratory.

The project ran for six years from April 1992 until April 1998 with a further modelling and synthesis phase beginning in April 1998 and ending in April 2000.

Project Structure

LOIS consisted of the following components:

  • River-Atmosphere-Coast Study (RACS)
    • RACS(A) - Atmospheric sub-component
    • RACS(C) - Coasts sub-component
    • RACS(R) - Rivers sub-component
    • BIOTA - Terrestrial salt marsh study
  • Land Ocean Evolution Perspective Study (LOEPS)
  • Shelf-Edge Study (SES)
  • North Sea Modelling Study (NORMS)
  • Data Management (DATA)

Marine Fieldwork

Marine field data were collected between September 1993 and September 1997 as part of RACS(C) and SES. The RACS data were collected throughout this period from the estuaries and coastal waters of the UK North Sea coast from Great Yarmouth to the Tweed. The SES data were collected between March 1995 and September 1996 from the Hebridean slope. Both the RACS and SES data sets incorporate a broad spectrum of measurements collected using moored instruments and research vessel surveys.

Data Activity or Cruise Information


Cruise Name CH126B
Departure Date 1996-04-27
Arrival Date 1996-05-12
Principal Scientist(s)Paul Tett (Napier University School of Life Sciences)
Ship RRS Challenger

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here

Fixed Station Information

Fixed Station Information

Station NameLOIS (SES) Repeat Section P
CategoryOffshore route/traverse

LOIS (SES) Repeat Section P

Section P was one of four repeat sections sampled during the Land-Ocean Interaction Study (LOIS) Shelf Edge Study (SES) project between March 1995 and September 1996.

The CTD measurements collected at repeat section P, on the Hebridean Slope, lie within a box bounded by co-ordinates 56° 33.0' N, 9° 37.8' W at the southwest corner and 56° 39.0' N, 8° 55.8' W at the northeast corner.

Cruises occupying section P

Cruise Start Date End Date
Charles Darwin 93B 16/05/1995 30/05/1995
Tydeman SESAME-1 10/08/1995 11/09/1995
Challenger 121C 01/09/1995 10/09/1995
Challenger 123B 01/12/1995 15/12/1995
Challenger 125A 31/01/1996 12/02/1996
Challenger 126A 11/04/1996 26/04/1996
Challenger 126B 27/04/1996 12/05/1996
Challenger 128A 10/07/1996 26/07/1996
Challenger 128B 26/07/1996 08/08/1996

Related Fixed Station activities are detailed in Appendix 1

BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
B nominal value
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: LOIS (SES) Repeat Section P

Related series for this Fixed Station are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
849053CTD or STD cast1995-05-19 14:48:0056.6495 N, 9.61367 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
849065CTD or STD cast1995-05-19 17:55:0056.63067 N, 9.4645 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
849471CTD or STD cast1995-05-19 20:15:0056.6045 N, 9.28517 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
849077CTD or STD cast1995-05-19 22:20:0056.59867 N, 9.22533 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
848603CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 01:19:0056.58883 N, 9.18267 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
848283CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 02:52:0056.57783 N, 9.1135 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
849201CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 04:14:0056.56817 N, 9.0525 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
848295CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 05:23:0056.56583 N, 9.03183 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
848615CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 06:25:0056.56267 N, 9.00317 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
848627CTD or STD cast1995-05-20 07:31:0056.5505 N, 8.93517 WRRS Charles Darwin CD93B
852165CTD or STD cast1995-09-06 05:10:0056.60467 N, 9.28667 WRRS Challenger CH121C
852073CTD or STD cast1995-09-07 04:04:0056.56067 N, 9.00233 WRRS Challenger CH121C
852085CTD or STD cast1995-09-07 04:37:0056.569 N, 9.05383 WRRS Challenger CH121C
852189CTD or STD cast1995-09-07 05:15:0056.56433 N, 9.032 WRRS Challenger CH121C
852097CTD or STD cast1995-09-07 13:04:0056.57667 N, 9.111 WRRS Challenger CH121C
855427CTD or STD cast1995-12-09 22:33:0056.54767 N, 8.93567 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855083CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 00:54:0056.5665 N, 9.037 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855439CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 06:06:0056.57967 N, 9.05983 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855440CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 07:20:0056.57917 N, 9.10833 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855095CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 08:45:0056.5885 N, 9.17983 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855452CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 10:23:0056.591 N, 9.23767 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855913CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 12:11:0056.6 N, 9.28967 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855102CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 13:58:0056.61133 N, 9.36767 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855464CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 15:57:0056.63017 N, 9.45283 WRRS Challenger CH123B
855476CTD or STD cast1995-12-10 18:43:0056.651 N, 9.59233 WRRS Challenger CH123B
856166CTD or STD cast1996-02-10 21:21:0056.54933 N, 8.93217 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856178CTD or STD cast1996-02-10 22:09:0056.55817 N, 8.998 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856191CTD or STD cast1996-02-10 22:49:0056.564 N, 9.03183 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856209CTD or STD cast1996-02-10 23:52:0056.5755 N, 9.119 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856210CTD or STD cast1996-02-11 00:55:0056.58433 N, 9.18333 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856222CTD or STD cast1996-02-11 02:14:0056.602 N, 9.30033 WRRS Challenger CH125A
856234CTD or STD cast1996-02-11 04:15:0056.6265 N, 9.47483 WRRS Challenger CH125A
858277CTD or STD cast1996-04-21 12:51:0056.65217 N, 9.62633 WRRS Challenger CH126A
1675633Water sample data1996-04-21 13:49:0056.65217 N, 9.62634 WRRS Challenger CH126A
859822CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 00:47:0056.55 N, 8.93483 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859834CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 01:41:0056.56117 N, 9.00417 WRRS Challenger CH126B
858498CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 02:24:0056.56517 N, 9.033 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859846CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 03:12:0056.5685 N, 9.05333 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859858CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 04:12:0056.57917 N, 9.114 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859871CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 05:22:0056.5905 N, 9.1815 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859883CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 06:39:0056.598 N, 9.23083 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859902CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 10:06:0056.62517 N, 9.45767 WRRS Challenger CH126B
859914CTD or STD cast1996-05-04 12:05:0056.6435 N, 9.6275 WRRS Challenger CH126B
860190CTD or STD cast1996-07-12 22:41:0056.591 N, 9.28367 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292054Water sample data1996-07-12 23:13:0056.59105 N, 9.28359 WRRS Challenger CH128A
860638CTD or STD cast1996-07-13 22:47:0056.58217 N, 9.19033 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292078Water sample data1996-07-13 23:14:0056.58217 N, 9.19037 WRRS Challenger CH128A
860651CTD or STD cast1996-07-14 00:43:0056.579 N, 9.1235 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292091Water sample data1996-07-14 01:07:0056.57894 N, 9.12346 WRRS Challenger CH128A
860417CTD or STD cast1996-07-14 05:00:0056.57283 N, 9.05517 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292109Water sample data1996-07-14 05:14:0056.5728 N, 9.0552 WRRS Challenger CH128A
860663CTD or STD cast1996-07-14 06:11:0056.5665 N, 9.03067 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292110Water sample data1996-07-14 06:20:0056.56648 N, 9.03061 WRRS Challenger CH128A
860675CTD or STD cast1996-07-14 07:20:0056.5515 N, 8.93617 WRRS Challenger CH128A
1292134Water sample data1996-07-14 07:26:0056.55145 N, 8.93623 WRRS Challenger CH128A
861421CTD or STD cast1996-08-02 13:22:0056.62317 N, 9.596 WRRS Challenger CH128B
861119CTD or STD cast1996-08-03 21:01:0056.6005 N, 9.28817 WRRS Challenger CH128B