Search the data

Metadata Report for BODC Series Reference Number 1663773


Metadata Summary

Data Description

Data Category Water sample data
Instrument Type
NameCategories
Technicap NOEX bottle  discrete water samplers
Instrument Mounting lowered unmanned submersible
Originating Country Netherlands
Originator Dr Peter de Wilde
Originating Organization Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Processing Status banked
Online delivery of data Download available - Ocean Data View (ODV) format
Project(s) OMEX I
 

Data Identifiers

Originator's Identifier CD86_CTD_PIGX_95:04
BODC Series Reference 1663773
 

Time Co-ordinates(UT)

Start Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) 1994-05-25 14:24
End Time (yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm) -
Nominal Cycle Interval -
 

Spatial Co-ordinates

Latitude 49.19405 N ( 49° 11.6' N )
Longitude 12.74502 W ( 12° 44.7' W )
Positional Uncertainty 0.05 to 0.1 n.miles
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Depth 1275.0 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Depth 1275.0 m
Minimum Sensor or Sampling Height 28.5 m
Maximum Sensor or Sampling Height 28.5 m
Sea Floor Depth 1303.5 m
Sea Floor Depth Source -
Sensor or Sampling Distribution Unspecified -
Sensor or Sampling Depth Datum Unspecified -
Sea Floor Depth Datum Unspecified -
 

Parameters

BODC CODERankUnitsTitle
ADEPZZ011MetresDepth (spatial coordinate) relative to water surface in the water body
BOTTFLAG1Not applicableSampling process quality flag (BODC C22)
CLPHHPP11Milligrams per cubic metreConcentration of chlorophyll-a+phaeophorbides per unit volume of the water body [particulate >GF/F phase] by filtration, acetone extraction and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)
SAMPRFNM1DimensionlessSample reference number

Definition of BOTTFLAG

BOTTFLAGDefinition
0The sampling event occurred without any incident being reported to BODC.
1The filter in an in-situ sampling pump physically ruptured during sample resulting in an unquantifiable loss of sampled material.
2Analytical evidence (e.g. surface water salinity measured on a sample collected at depth) indicates that the water sample has been contaminated by water from depths other than the depths of sampling.
3The feedback indicator on the deck unit reported that the bottle closure command had failed. General Oceanics deck units used on NERC vessels in the 80s and 90s were renowned for reporting misfires when the bottle had been closed. This flag is also suitable for when a trigger command is mistakenly sent to a bottle that has previously been fired.
4During the sampling deployment the bottle was fired in an order other than incrementing rosette position. Indicative of the potential for errors in the assignment of bottle firing depth, especially with General Oceanics rosettes.
5Water was reported to be escaping from the bottle as the rosette was being recovered.
6The bottle seals were observed to be incorrectly seated and the bottle was only part full of water on recovery.
7Either the bottle was found to contain no sample on recovery or there was no bottle fitted to the rosette position fired (but SBE35 record may exist).
8There is reason to doubt the accuracy of the sampling depth associated with the sample.
9The bottle air vent had not been closed prior to deployment giving rise to a risk of sample contamination through leakage.

Definition of Rank

  • Rank 1 is a one-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 2 is a two-dimensional parameter
  • Rank 0 is a one-dimensional parameter describing the second dimension of a two-dimensional parameter (e.g. bin depths for moored ADCP data)

Problem Reports

No Problem Report Found in the Database


Data Access Policy

Public domain data

These data have no specific confidentiality restrictions for users. However, users must acknowledge data sources as it is not ethical to publish data without proper attribution. Any publication or other output resulting from usage of the data should include an acknowledgment.

The recommended acknowledgment is

"This study uses data from the data source/organisation/programme, provided by the British Oceanographic Data Centre and funded by the funding body."


Narrative Documents

Technicap NOEX bottle

The Technicap NOEX water bottle was designed for oceanographic sampling. The bottle comprises a plastic tube with caps at each end and is deployed with the caps held open, then closed at the target depth. Multiple bottles can be deployed on a CTD frame rosette. Bottle capacity is variable, but normally several litres. The bottle was developed by Technicap in the 1990s but has been superseded by more recent models. There is no known source of support available for this sampler.

Pigments for cruises Charles Darwin CD86, Pelagia PLG93 andPLG95A

Document History

Converted from CDROM documentation.

Content of data series

ACARHPP1 Alpha-carotene
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
ALLOHPP1 Alloxanthin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
BCARHPP1 Beta-carotene
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
BUTAHPP1 Butanoyloxyfucoxanthin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
C1C2HPP1 Chlorophyll-c1c2
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
CAROSSP1 Spectrophotometric carotenoid pigments (SCOR)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (GF/F filtered)
milligrams/cubic metre
CHLBHPP1 Chlorophyll-b
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
CHLBSSP1 Spectrophotometric chlorophyll-b (SCOR)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
CHLCSSP1 Spectrophotometric chlorophyll-c (SCOR)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
CLC3HPP1 Chlorophyll-c3
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
CLPHHPP1 Chlorophyll-a plus phaeophorbides
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLFLP1 Fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLFLP4 Fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extraction (sum of size fractions >0.2 microns)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLFMP1 Fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of methanol extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLHPP1 HPLC chlorophyll-a
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLPR01 CTD chlorophyll
Calibrated in-situ fluorometer
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLPRTX Bench fluorometer chlorophyll
Bench fluorometer measurement on unfiltered water sample
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLSPP1 Spectrophotometric chlorophyll-a (Lorenzen)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLSSP1 Spectrophotometric chlorophyll-a (SCOR)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
CPHLSSPC Spectrophotometric chlorophyll-a (SCOR)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extraction (centrifuged)
Milligrams/cubic metre
DIADHPP1 Diadinoxanthin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
DVCAHPP1 Diavinyl chlorophyll-a
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
FUCXHPP1 Fucoxanthin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
HEXOHPP1 Hexanoyloxyfucoxanthin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
LUTNHPP1 Lutein
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PBA1HPP1 Phaeophorbide-a1
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PBA2HPP1 Phaeophorbide-a2
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PBA3HPP1 Phaeophorbide-a3
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PERIHPP1 Peridinin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PHAEFLP1 Fluorometric phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
PHAEFLP4 Fluorometric phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (sum of size fractions >0.2 microns)
Milligrams/cubic metre
PHAEFMP1 Fluorometric phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of methanol extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
PHAESPP1 Spectrophotometric phaeopigments (Lorenzen)
Spectrophotometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
PTA1HPP1 Phaeophytin-a1
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
PTA2HPP1 Phaeophytin-a2
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre
SCHLFLPA Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (>5 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SCHLFLPB Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (>2 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SCHLFLPC Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (2-5 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SCHLFLPF Size-fractionated fluorometric chlorophyll-a
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (0.2-2 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SPHAFLPA Size-fractionated phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (>5 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SPHAFLPB Size-fractionated phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (>2 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SPHAFLPC Size-fractionated phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (0.2-2 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
SPHAFLPF Size-fractionated phaeopigments
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (>2 micron size fraction)
Milligrams/cubic metre
TCPEFLP1 Total chloroplastic pigment
Fluorometric assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Milligrams/cubic metre
ZEOXHPP1 Zeoxantin
HPLC assay of acetone extract (GF/F filtered)
Nanograms per litre

Data Originator

Dr Peter de Wilde, NIOZ, Texel, the Netherlands.

Sampling strategy and methodology

Water samples were taken from the CTD rosette or the bottles on the BOLAS lander, filtered through GF/F filters and analysed by means of HPLC. The eluents, gradient and column were similar to those described in Wright et al. (1991) with minor modifications. Pigments were detected by a photodiode array coupled with a fluorometer and quantified according to Tahey et al. (1994).

Comments on data quality

The values quoted are based on a nominal fluorometer calibration. The data should therefore only be used for relative comparisons. The absolute values are meaningless.

References

Barlow, R.G., Mantoura, R.F.C., Gough, M.A. and Fileman, T.W., 1993a. Pigment signatures of the phytoplankton composition in the north-east Atlantic during the 1990 spring bloom. Deep Sea Res. II, 40, 459-477.

Barlow, R.G., Mantoura, R.F.C., Gough, M.A. and Fileman, T.W., 1993b. Phaeopigment distribution during the 1990 spring bloom in the north-east Atlantic. Deep Sea Res. I, 40, 2229-2242.

Barlow, R.G., Cummings, D.G., Mantoura, R.F.C. and Fileman, T.W., 1996. Pigment chemotaxonomic distributions of phytoplankton during summer in the western Mediterranean. Deep Sea Res. II, in press.

Holm-Hansen, O., Lorenzen, C.J., Holmes, R.W. and Strictland, J.D.H., 1965. Fluorometric determination of chlorophyll. J. Con. perm. int. Explor. 30, 3-15.

Jeffrey, S.W. and Humphrey, G.F., 1975. New spectrophotometric equations for determining chlorophylls a, b, c1 and c2 in higher plants, algae and natural phytoplankton. Biochem. Physiol. Pflan., 167, 191-194.

Lorenzen, C.J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and phaeopigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnology and Oceanography, 12.

Lorenzen, C.J. and Jeffrey, S.W., 1978. Determination of chlorophyll in seawater. UNESCO Techn. Paper Mar Sci, 35.

Strickland, J.D.H., Parsons, T.R. (1972). A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fish. Res. Bd. Can.,.167-311.

Tahey, T.M., Duineveld, G.C.A., Berghuis, E.M. and Helder, W., 1994. Relation between sediment-water fluxes of oxygen and silicate and faunal abundance at continental shelf, slope and deep-water stations in the North West Mediterranean. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 104, 119-130.

Thomsen. L., Graf, G., Martens, V. and Steen, E., 1994. An instrument for sampling water from the bottom nepheloid layer. Contin. Shelf Res., 14, 871-882.

Thomsen, L. and Graf, G., 1995. Benthic boundary layer characteristics of the continental margin of the western Barents Sea. Oceanologica Acta, 17/6, 597-607.

Wright, S.W., Jeffrey, S.W., Mantoura, R.F.C., Llewellyn, C.A., Bjornland, T., Repeta, D. and Welschmeyer, N., 1991. Improved HPLC method for the analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 77, 183-196.


Project Information

Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) I

Introduction

OMEX was a European multidisciplinary oceanographic research project that studied and quantified the exchange processes of carbon and associated elements between the continental shelf of western Europe and the open Atlantic Ocean. The project ran in two phases known as OMEX I (1993-1996) and OMEX II - II (1997-2000), with a bridging phase OMEX II - I (1996-1997). The project was supported by the European Union under the second and third phases of its MArine Science and Technology Programme (MAST) through contracts MAS2-CT93-0069 and MAS3-CT97-0076. It was led by Professor Roland Wollast from Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium and involved more than 100 scientists from 10 European countries.

Scientific Objectives

The aim of the Ocean Margin EXchange (OMEX) project was to gain a better understanding of the physical, chemical and biological processes occurring at the ocean margins in order to quantify fluxes of energy and matter (carbon, nutrients and other trace elements) across this boundary. The research culminated in the development of quantitative budgets for the areas studied using an approach based on both field measurements and modeling.

OMEX I (1993-1996)

The first phase of OMEX was divided into sub-projects by discipline:

  • Physics
  • Biogeochemical Cycles
  • Biological Processes
  • Benthic Processes
  • Carbon Cycling and Biogases

This emphasises the multidisciplinary nature of the research.

The project fieldwork focussed on the region of the European Margin adjacent to the Goban Spur (off the coast of Brittany) and the shelf break off Tromsø, Norway. However, there was also data collected off the Iberian Margin and to the west of Ireland. In all a total of 57 research cruises (excluding 295 Continuous Plankton Recorder tows) were involved in the collection of OMEX I data.

Data Availability

Field data collected during OMEX I have been published by BODC as a CD-ROM product, entitled:

  • OMEX I Project Data Set (two discs)

Further descriptions of this product and order forms may be found on the BODC web site.

The data are also held in BODC's databases and subsets may be obtained by request from BODC.


Data Activity or Cruise Information

Data Activity

Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1994-05-25
End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) 1994-05-25
Organization Undertaking ActivityRoyal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research
Country of OrganizationNetherlands
Originator's Data Activity IdentifierCD86_CTD_04
Platform Categorylowered unmanned submersible

BODC Sample Metadata Report for CD86_CTD_04

Sample reference number Nominal collection volume(l) Bottle rosette position Bottle firing sequence number Minimum pressure sampled (dbar) Maximum pressure sampled (dbar) Depth of sampling point (m) Bottle type Sample quality flag Bottle reference Comments
551165   12.00        3.30    4.90    4.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551166   12.00       20.40   22.00   21.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551167   12.00       33.50   35.10   34.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551168   12.00       54.60   56.20   55.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551169   12.00      103.90  105.50  104.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551170   12.00      304.20  305.80  303.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551171   12.00      582.30  583.90  579.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551172   12.00      928.50  930.10  922.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551192   12.00       12.40   14.00   13.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551201   12.00      203.50  205.10  203.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    
551208   12.00     1285.30 1286.90 1275.00 Technicap NOEX bottle No problem reported    

Please note:the supplied parameters may not have been sampled from all the bottle firings described in the table above. Cross-match the Sample Reference Number above against the SAMPRFNM value in the data file to identify the relevant metadata.

Related Data Activity activities are detailed in Appendix 1

Cruise

Cruise Name CD86
Departure Date 1994-05-20
Arrival Date 1994-06-13
Principal Scientist(s)Tjeerd van Weering (Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research)
Ship RRS Charles Darwin

Complete Cruise Metadata Report is available here


Fixed Station Information

Fixed Station Information

Station NameOMEX I site OMEX2
CategoryOffshore area
Latitude49° 11.46' N
Longitude12° 48.00' W
Water depth below MSL1418.0 m

OMEX I Moored Instrument and CTD site OMEX2

OMEX2 was one of four fixed stations for the OMEX I project. It was visited by twelve cruises and collected a variety of data during the period June 1993 to October 1995. These include:

  • Mooring deployments - Aandeera current meters with transmissometers
  • CTD casts
  • Net trawls
  • Plankton recorders
  • Cores
  • Water samples

The data collected a site OMEX2 lay within a box bounded by co-ordinates 49° 6.72'N, 013° 16.03'W at the southwest corner and 49° 17.2'N, 012° 44.4'W at the northeast corner, with an approximate depth of 1500 metres.

Related Fixed Station activities are detailed in Appendix 2


BODC Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
Blank Unqualified
< Below detection limit
> In excess of quoted value
A Taxonomic flag for affinis (aff.)
B Beginning of CTD Down/Up Cast
C Taxonomic flag for confer (cf.)
D Thermometric depth
E End of CTD Down/Up Cast
G Non-taxonomic biological characteristic uncertainty
H Extrapolated value
I Taxonomic flag for single species (sp.)
K Improbable value - unknown quality control source
L Improbable value - originator's quality control
M Improbable value - BODC quality control
N Null value
O Improbable value - user quality control
P Trace/calm
Q Indeterminate
R Replacement value
S Estimated value
T Interpolated value
U Uncalibrated
W Control value
X Excessive difference

SeaDataNet Quality Control Flags

The following single character qualifying flags may be associated with one or more individual parameters with a data cycle:

Flag Description
0 no quality control
1 good value
2 probably good value
3 probably bad value
4 bad value
5 changed value
6 value below detection
7 value in excess
8 interpolated value
9 missing value
A value phenomenon uncertain
Q value below limit of quantification

Appendix 1: CD86_CTD_04

Related series for this Data Activity are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
1259850Water sample data1994-05-25 14:24:0049.19405 N, 12.74502 WRRS Charles Darwin CD86

Appendix 2: OMEX I site OMEX2

Related series for this Fixed Station are presented in the table below. Further information can be found by following the appropriate links.

If you are interested in these series, please be aware we offer a multiple file download service. Should your credentials be insufficient for automatic download, the service also offers a referral to our Enquiries Officer who may be able to negotiate access.

Series IdentifierData CategoryStart date/timeStart positionCruise
444382Multiple data types -fixed platform1993-06-24 20:29:0049.1885 N, 12.7333 WFS Poseidon PO200_7
319390Currents -subsurface Eulerian1993-06-27 11:49:0049.2872 N, 12.8193 WFS Poseidon PO200_7
319389Currents -subsurface Eulerian1993-06-27 12:27:0049.2872 N, 12.8193 WFS Poseidon PO200_7
920244CTD or STD cast1993-06-29 14:29:0049.193 N, 12.944 WValdivia VLD137
920256CTD or STD cast1993-06-29 15:13:0049.179 N, 12.957 WValdivia VLD137
883705CTD or STD cast1993-09-25 07:41:0049.22783 N, 12.80017 WRV Belgica BG9322A
883717CTD or STD cast1993-09-25 12:36:0049.25967 N, 12.80733 WRV Belgica BG9322A
1271492Water sample data1993-09-25 12:53:0049.25973 N, 12.80741 WRV Belgica BG9322A
883729CTD or STD cast1993-09-25 15:46:0049.26067 N, 12.81033 WRV Belgica BG9322A
883730CTD or STD cast1993-09-25 17:22:0049.1975 N, 12.74367 WRV Belgica BG9322A
1271511Water sample data1993-09-25 17:57:0049.1975 N, 12.74369 WRV Belgica BG9322A
883742CTD or STD cast1993-09-25 19:55:0049.23033 N, 12.794 WRV Belgica BG9322A
1271523Water sample data1993-09-25 20:18:0049.23031 N, 12.79403 WRV Belgica BG9322A
914969CTD or STD cast1993-10-21 08:46:0049.18667 N, 12.81967 WRV Pelagia PE093
908153CTD or STD cast1994-01-05 13:06:0049.18333 N, 12.81 WFS Meteor M27_1
908165CTD or STD cast1994-01-05 16:47:0049.17 N, 12.79167 WFS Meteor M27_1
444369Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-01-11 08:41:0049.1883 N, 12.795 WFS Meteor M27_1
444370Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-01-11 08:55:0049.1883 N, 12.795 WFS Meteor M27_1
908233CTD or STD cast1994-01-11 17:01:0049.21167 N, 12.88333 WFS Meteor M27_1
887362CTD or STD cast1994-04-16 06:51:0049.4215 N, 12.7765 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
887301CTD or STD cast1994-04-18 03:36:0049.1445 N, 12.7865 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
887313CTD or STD cast1994-04-18 05:53:0049.16517 N, 12.768 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
444321Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-04-18 13:56:0049.1865 N, 12.8194 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
444308Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-04-18 14:04:0049.1865 N, 12.8194 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
887325CTD or STD cast1994-04-18 21:15:0049.133 N, 12.82217 WRRS Charles Darwin CD85
974033CTD or STD cast1994-05-25 13:50:0049.194 N, 12.745 WRRS Charles Darwin CD86
444394Multiple data types -fixed platform1994-06-30 22:15:0049.1873 N, 12.8218 WRRS Charles Darwin CD86
910378CTD or STD cast1994-09-16 02:37:0049.18333 N, 12.845 WFS Meteor M30_1
442941Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-09-16 13:10:0049.1912 N, 12.8 WFS Meteor M30_1
442928Currents -subsurface Eulerian1994-09-16 13:14:0049.1912 N, 12.8 WFS Meteor M30_1
885275CTD or STD cast1995-06-12 23:00:0049.2025 N, 12.8185 WRRS Charles Darwin CD94
915008CTD or STD cast1995-08-21 06:15:0049.1865 N, 12.8195 WRV Pelagia PE95A
915162CTD or STD cast1995-09-18 19:37:0049.18983 N, 12.74183 WRV Pelagia PE95B
886475CTD or STD cast1995-10-01 04:24:0049.19567 N, 12.811 WRRS Discovery D217
886358CTD or STD cast1995-10-05 05:00:0049.1875 N, 12.80517 WRRS Discovery D217
886371CTD or STD cast1995-10-05 11:37:0049.191 N, 12.84267 WRRS Discovery D217
1676280Water sample data1995-10-05 12:39:0049.19099 N, 12.84267 WRRS Discovery D217
886383CTD or STD cast1995-10-05 14:53:0049.1955 N, 12.85833 WRRS Discovery D217
1676292Water sample data1995-10-05 15:07:0049.19553 N, 12.85834 WRRS Discovery D217
886229CTD or STD cast1995-10-14 05:20:0049.19217 N, 12.8065 WRRS Discovery D217
1676359Water sample data1995-10-14 05:35:0049.19215 N, 12.80656 WRRS Discovery D217